The relevance of the high positive predictive value of the oral brush biopsy

Comment

Drore Eisen et al. Oral Oncol. 2005 Aug.

. 2005 Aug;41(7):753-5; author reply 756.

doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2004.10.004.

No abstract available

Comment in

Re: Eisen, D & Frist, S--letter.
Porter SR, Poate TW, Hodgson TA, Buchanan JA, Moles DR, Scully C, Speight PM, Barrett AW. Porter SR, et al. Oral Oncol. 2005 Sep;41(8):861. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2004.12.001. Oral Oncol. 2005. PMID: 15935727 No abstract available.

The sensitivity and specificity of the OralCDx technique: evaluation of 103 cases.
Scheifele C, Schmidt-Westhausen AM, Dietrich T, Reichart PA. Scheifele C, et al. Oral Oncol. 2004 Sep;40(8):824-8. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2004.02.004. Oral Oncol. 2004. PMID: 15288838
An audit of the efficacy of the oral brush biopsy technique in a specialist Oral Medicine unit.
Poate TW, Buchanan JA, Hodgson TA, Speight PM, Barrett AW, Moles DR, Scully C, Porter SR. Poate TW, et al. Oral Oncol. 2004 Sep;40(8):829-34. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2004.02.005. Oral Oncol. 2004. PMID: 15288839