Use of PET for monitoring cancer therapy and for predicting outcome
- PMID: 15937310
Use of PET for monitoring cancer therapy and for predicting outcome
Abstract
PET with the glucose analog (18)F-FDG is increasingly used to monitor tumor response in patients undergoing chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy. Numerous studies have shown that (18)F-FDG PET is an accurate test for differentiating residual viable tumor tissue from therapy-induced fibrosis. Furthermore, quantitative assessment of therapy-induced changes in tumor (18)F-FDG uptake may allow the prediction of tumor response and patient outcome very early in the course of therapy. Treatment may be adjusted according to the chemosensitivity and radiosensitivity of the tumor tissue in an individual patient. Thus, (18)F-FDG PET has an enormous potential to reduce the side effects and costs of ineffective therapy. This review focuses on the practical aspects of (18)F-FDG PET for treatment monitoring and on how to perform a quantitative assessment of tumor (18)F-FDG uptake in clinical studies.
Similar articles
-
Role of positron emission tomography in the early prediction of response to chemotherapy in patients with non--small-cell lung cancer.Clin Lung Cancer. 2012 May;13(3):181-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2011.05.004. Epub 2011 Dec 1. Clin Lung Cancer. 2012. PMID: 22137017 Review.
-
Monitoring response to therapeutic interventions in patients with cancer.Semin Nucl Med. 2009 May;39(3):210-32. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2008.12.001. Semin Nucl Med. 2009. PMID: 19341841 Review.
-
Monitoring chemotherapy and radiotherapy of solid tumors.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006 Jul;33 Suppl 1:27-37. doi: 10.1007/s00259-006-0133-3. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006. PMID: 16688451 Review.
-
[18F-FDG-PET in therapy response of esophageal cancer].Radiologe. 2007 Feb;47(2):110-4. doi: 10.1007/s00117-006-1461-9. Radiologe. 2007. PMID: 17225182 Review. German.
-
Monitoring predominantly cytostatic treatment response with 18F-FDG PET.J Nucl Med. 2009 May;50 Suppl 1:97S-105S. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.057273. J Nucl Med. 2009. PMID: 19403880 Review.
Cited by
-
FDG Dose Extravasations in PET/CT: Frequency and Impact on SUV Measurements.Front Oncol. 2011 Nov 16;1:41. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2011.00041. eCollection 2011. Front Oncol. 2011. PMID: 22655246 Free PMC article.
-
Test-Retest Reproducibility of 18F-FDG PET/CT Uptake in Cancer Patients Within a Qualified and Calibrated Local Network.J Nucl Med. 2019 May;60(5):608-614. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.209544. Epub 2018 Oct 25. J Nucl Med. 2019. PMID: 30361381 Free PMC article.
-
Magnetic graphene oxide-lignin nanobiocomposite: a novel, eco-friendly and stable nanostructure suitable for hyperthermia in cancer therapy.RSC Adv. 2022 Jan 26;12(6):3593-3601. doi: 10.1039/d1ra08640e. eCollection 2022 Jan 24. RSC Adv. 2022. PMID: 35425373 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery: Charting our course for the future.Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2011 Dec;1(1):1-3. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4292.2011.09.01. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2011. PMID: 23256048 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Two-time-point FDG PET/CT: liver SULmean repeatability.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Feb;204(2):402-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.12719. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015. PMID: 25615764 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical