The influence of cochlear implantation on some voice parameters
- PMID: 15939488
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.03.045
The influence of cochlear implantation on some voice parameters
Abstract
Objective: Some of the voice characteristics of deaf people differ considerably from those of speakers with normal hearing. After a cochlear implantation, auditory control of voice production is possible and the quality of the voice is improved. The aim of this study was to investigate the changes in some of the voice parameters in deaf children after cochlear implantation.
Methods: Thirty-one prelingually deafened children implanted unilaterally at the age of 2.5-13 years were included in the study. For all of the children an acoustic analysis (Multi-Dimensional Voice Program, Kay Elemetrics Corp., USA) of the Slovene vowel 'a' was performed before cochlear implantation and 6, 12 and 24 months after the implantation. The fundamental frequency (F0), jitter, shimmer and noise-to-harmonic ratio (NHR) were compared before and after the implantation. The results of the acoustic analyses were compared for the children who were implanted before or at the age of 4 years and the children who were implanted after the age of 4 years.
Results: After the cochlear implantation the fundamental frequency did not change significantly. However, an improvement was noticed in the measurements of jitter (p=0.006) and shimmer (p=0.021) as early as 6 months after the implantation. The noise-to-harmonic ratio improved (p=0.013) 24 months after the implantation. The children implanted before or at the age of 4 years showed a significant improvement in jitter (p=0.003) and shimmer (p=0.004) as early as 6 months and in noise-to-harmonic ratio (p=0.021) 12 months after the implantation. In the children implanted after the age of 4 years the only significant change was detected in F0 (p=0.045), 12 months after the implantation, and in Shimmer (p=0.017), 24 months after the implantation.
Conclusion: The results of the present study have confirmed that cochlear implantation enables auditory moment-to-moment control of pitch and loudness. The determination of jitter and shimmer in the vowel 'a' sample proved to be a good and early indicator of improved phonation control, even in young children. The deaf children who were implanted before the age of 4 years improved their voice control more quickly and to a greater extent than the children implanted after the age of 4 years.
Comment in
-
Voice analysis in pediatric cochlear implant recipients.Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2006 Apr;70(4):760. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.12.012. Epub 2006 Jan 24. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2006. PMID: 16442167 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Change of phonation control after cochlear implantation.Otol Neurotol. 2006 Jun;27(4):499-503. doi: 10.1097/01.mao.0000224083.70225.b7. Otol Neurotol. 2006. PMID: 16791041
-
Acoustic voice analysis of prelingually deaf adults before and after cochlear implantation.J Voice. 2007 Nov;21(6):669-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2006.07.005. Epub 2006 Sep 6. J Voice. 2007. PMID: 16952440
-
Longitudinal changes in children's speech and voice physiology after cochlear implantation.Ear Hear. 2003 Feb;24(1):48-70. doi: 10.1097/01.AUD.0000051846.71105.AF. Ear Hear. 2003. PMID: 12598813
-
Is there a critical period for cochlear implantation in congenitally deaf children? Analyses of hearing and speech perception performance after implantation.Dev Psychobiol. 2005 Apr;46(3):252-61. doi: 10.1002/dev.20052. Dev Psychobiol. 2005. PMID: 15772969 Review.
-
The influence of the auditory prosthesis type on deaf children's voice quality.Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2010 Aug;74(8):843-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.04.011. Epub 2010 May 15. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2010. PMID: 20472309 Review.
Cited by
-
Classification of voice disorder in children with cochlear implantation and hearing aid using multiple classifier fusion.Biomed Eng Online. 2011 Jan 14;10:3. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-10-3. Biomed Eng Online. 2011. PMID: 21235800 Free PMC article.
-
Hearing performance and voice acoustics of cochlear implanted children.Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Jan-Feb;82(1):70-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.11.002. Epub 2015 Dec 2. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2016. PMID: 26710684 Free PMC article.
-
Preoperative voice parameters affect the postoperative speech intelligibility in patients with cochlear implantation.Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Apr;5 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S69-72. doi: 10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S69. Epub 2012 Apr 30. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2012. PMID: 22701152 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of age of cochlear implantation on vocal characteristics in children.S Afr J Commun Disord. 2016 Jun 27;63(1):142. doi: 10.4102/sajcd.v63i1.142. S Afr J Commun Disord. 2016. PMID: 27380914 Free PMC article.
-
A Comparative Study of Voice Characteristics in Children With Cochlear Implants and Typically Hearing Children: Insights From an Indian Context.Cureus. 2023 Oct 31;15(10):e48050. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48050. eCollection 2023 Oct. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 38034234 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical