Twenty-millimeter laparoscopic cholecystectomy: fewer ports results in less pain, shorter hospitalization, and faster recovery
- PMID: 15943402
Twenty-millimeter laparoscopic cholecystectomy: fewer ports results in less pain, shorter hospitalization, and faster recovery
Abstract
Improvements in technology offer the ability to refine operations without compromising safety. In this study, we determine whether a modified method of laparoscopic cholecystectomy using three ports and an aggregate incision length of 20 mm offers any advantage or poses increased risk. Using a 5-mm, 30 degree laparoscope, clip applier, and dissector, the gall bladder is removed through an extended umbilical incision. Standard safety principles were followed: achieving the "critical view," lateral retraction of the fundus, double ligation of the proximal structures, and maintaining sterility for specimen removal. Forty-one consecutive standard laparoscopic cholecystectomies were used as a control group to compare complications, length of stay and surgery, pain scores, and return to work. Sixty patients have undergone the modified technique. There were no differences between the modified and standard technique with regard to cost or complications. Length of surgery was significantly shorter, as was length of stay, narcotics use, and return to work for the modified group versus the control. A modified technique for laparoscopic cholecystectomy poses no increased risk to patients but offers potential for shorter surgery and hospital stays, less need for narcotic analgesia, and faster recovery.
Similar articles
-
Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy--a new advantage of gallbladder surgery.Coll Antropol. 2010 Jun;34(2):595-8. Coll Antropol. 2010. PMID: 20698134
-
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using glove port in comparison with standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy SILC using glove port.Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012 Feb;22(1):17-20. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e318242e12a. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012. PMID: 22318053
-
Minilaparoscopic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial.Trop Gastroenterol. 2005 Jul-Sep;26(3):149-51. Trop Gastroenterol. 2005. PMID: 16512468 Clinical Trial.
-
Cost-effectiveness of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2001 Jun;11(3):182-4. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2001. PMID: 11444748
-
Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the safety and effectiveness of day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Br J Surg. 2008 Feb;95(2):161-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6105. Br J Surg. 2008. PMID: 18196561 Review.
Cited by
-
Mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy with the MiniLap® percutaneous surgical system: a series of 32 patients.Int J Gen Med. 2018 Sep 20;11:369-371. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S172655. eCollection 2018. Int J Gen Med. 2018. PMID: 30288083 Free PMC article.
-
EUS-guided versus endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage in high-risk surgical patients with acute cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surg Endosc. 2020 May;34(5):1904-1913. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07409-7. Epub 2020 Feb 11. Surg Endosc. 2020. PMID: 32048019
-
Is fourth port really required in laparoscopic cholecystectomy?Indian J Surg. 2010 Oct;72(5):373-6. doi: 10.1007/s12262-010-0154-9. Epub 2010 Nov 18. Indian J Surg. 2010. PMID: 21966135 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) vs. conventional laparoscopic fundoplication for GERD: is there a difference?Surg Endosc. 2013 Feb;27(2):538-47. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2476-0. Epub 2012 Jul 18. Surg Endosc. 2013. PMID: 22806533
-
Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using Conventional Laparoscopic Instruments and Comparison with Three-Port Cholecystectomy.Indian J Surg. 2015 Dec;77(Suppl 2):546-50. doi: 10.1007/s12262-013-0918-0. Epub 2013 Apr 28. Indian J Surg. 2015. PMID: 26730062 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical