Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2005 Aug;170(4):1737-45.
doi: 10.1534/genetics.104.036178. Epub 2005 Jun 8.

Drosophila ERCC1 is required for a subset of MEI-9-dependent meiotic crossovers

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Drosophila ERCC1 is required for a subset of MEI-9-dependent meiotic crossovers

Sarah J Radford et al. Genetics. 2005 Aug.

Abstract

Drosophila MEI-9 is the catalytic subunit of a DNA structure-specific endonuclease required for nucleotide excision repair (NER). The enzymatic activity of this endonuclease during NER requires the presence of a second, noncatalytic subunit called ERCC1. In addition to its role in NER, MEI-9 is required for the generation of most meiotic crossovers. To better understand the role of MEI-9 in crossover formation, we report here the characterization of the Drosophila Ercc1 gene. We created an Ercc1 mutant through homologous gene targeting. We find that Ercc1 mutants are identical to mei-9 mutants in sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents, but have a less severe reduction in the number of meiotic crossovers. MEI-9 protein levels are reduced in Ercc1 mutants; however, overexpression of MEI-9 is not sufficient to restore meiotic crossing over in Ercc1 mutants. We conclude that MEI-9 can generate some meiotic crossovers in an ERCC1-independent manner.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

F<sc>igure</sc> 1.—
Figure 1.—
Vectors for gene targeting in Drosophila. Schematic maps of pP{Target} and pP{TargetB} are shown. Both vectors carry a mini-white marker gene (shaded arrow), FRTs (stippled triangles), an I-CreI endonuclease recognition sequence (X), and P-element ends for transposition (solid arrows). The two vectors differ in size and in restriction sites available for cloning.
F<sc>igure</sc> 2.—
Figure 2.—
Targeting of Ercc1. (A) Genes from the Ercc1 genomic region are shown as solid arrows (indicating direction of transcription) on a solid line, and genes on the targeting DNA are shown as open arrows or boxes on a shaded line. The targeting DNA is shown after excision by FLP recombinase and cutting by I-SceI endonuclease, with an asterisk marking the site of the double-strand break. This targeting fragment is drawn to show alignment of sequences with homology between the targeting DNA and the genomic DNA. The XhoI site introduced into Ercc1 is indicated by an X. The mini-white marker gene and the FRT and I-CreI sites are as in Figure 1. (B) The predicted product of ends-in integration with sequences derived from the targeting DNA in open symbols and chromosomal sequences as solid symbols. The region deleted in the integration that we recovered is indicated. (C) Predicted products from reduction of the tandem duplication after cutting with I-CreI and repair by single-strand annealing. One product is completely wild type (top), and the other carries Ercc1X and the adjacent deletion of Ciao1 (bottom). (D) The structure of the mutation used in these studies. It is equivalent to the targeted integration depicted in B, except that most of mini-white and one copy of Ercc1 have been deleted, and the remaining copy of Ercc1 carries the XhoI mutation.
F<sc>igure</sc> 3.—
Figure 3.—
Molecular analysis of tandem duplication and Ercc1X reduction. Allele-specific PCR was performed using either an Ercc1-specific primer (+) or a Ercc1X-specific primer (X) and a reverse primer complementary to sequence outside of the targeting sequence. PCR reactions were run on a standard agarose gel for analysis. The expected 2.4-kb product is seen with the “+” primer in wild type; however, the expected 2.4-kb product is missing with the X primer in Ercc1X and instead a 1.2-kb product is seen. A 800-bp product is seen with the X primer in the duplication, confirming the presence of the 1.6-kb deletion.
F<sc>igure</sc> 4.—
Figure 4.—
Sensitivity to killing by UV light of Ercc1X and mei-9 mutants. Percentage survival, relative to wild-type controls, after exposure of larvae to 500–1000 erg/mm2 (1 erg/mm2 = 0.1 J/m2) of UV light is shown for Ercc1X homozygous and hemizygous mutants and mei-9A2 mutants. Bars indicate standard deviations.
F<sc>igure</sc> 5.—
Figure 5.—
Expression of MEI-9 in ovaries. Ovarian proteins were separated on a polyacrylamide gel, transferred to PVDF membrane, and detected with polyclonal anti-MEI-9 serum. Genotypes of ovaries are (1) wild type, (2) mei-9A2, (3) zygotic Ercc1X, (4) maternal/zygotic Ercc1X, and (5) P{WUF9} in maternal/zygotic Ercc1X. MEI-9 is indicated by a solid arrowhead (Mr = 125 kDa). The antiserum also detects unknown proteins of lower molecular weight; one of these is included as a loading control. Flag-tagged MEI-9 protein (open arrowhead) produced from the P{WUF9} transgene migrates slightly faster than untagged MEI-9 (Mr = 113 kDa). The mei-9 cDNA used to make this construct lacks 35 nonessential amino acids at the N terminus (see materials and methods for details).
F<sc>igure</sc> 6.—
Figure 6.—
Yeast two-hybrid assay with ERCC1, MUS312, and MEI-9. ERCC1 was expressed in yeast as a fusion protein with the Gal4 DNA-binding domain (GBD) in a vector that either did (2, 4, 6) or did not (1, 3, 5) also express MEI-9. Yeast were transformed with an empty Gal4 activation domain (GAD) vector (1, 2), a vector expressing GAD-MEI-9 fusion protein (3, 4), or GAD-MUS312 fusion protein (5, 6). Growth on the −HIS dropout media shown indicates an interaction between the GBD and GAD fusion proteins.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bardwell, A. J., L. Bardwell, A. E. Tomkinson and E. C. Friedberg, 1994. Specific cleavage of model recombination and repair intermediates by the yeast Rad1-Rad10 DNA endonuclease. Science 265: 2082–2085. - PubMed
    1. Boyd, J. B., M. D. Golino, T. D. Nguyen and M. M. Green, 1976. Isolation and characterization of X-linked mutants of Drosophila melanogaster which are sensitive to mutagens. Genetics 84: 485–506. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Davies, A. A., E. C. Friedberg, A. E. Tomkinson, R. D. Wood and S. C. West, 1995. Role of the Rad1 and Rad10 proteins in nucleotide excision repair and recombination. J. Biol. Chem. 270: 24638–24641. - PubMed
    1. Donaldson, T. D., M. A. Noureddine, P. J. Reynolds, W. Bradford and R. J. Duronio, 2004. Targeted disruption of Drosophila Roc1b reveals functional differences in the Roc subunit of Cullin-dependent E3 ubiquitin ligases. Mol. Biol. Cell 15: 4892–4903. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Drysdale, R. A., M. A. Crosby and FlyBase Consortium, 2005. FlyBase: genes and gene models. Nucleic Acids Res. 33: D390–D395. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types