The word-superiority effect does not require a T-scope
- PMID: 1594437
- DOI: 10.3758/bf03211643
The word-superiority effect does not require a T-scope
Abstract
Six experiments examined the possibility of obtaining a word-superiority effect (WSE) without the use of brief stimulus exposures or a poststimulus mask. In each experiment, subjects were presented a stimulus string and two alternative strings that differed by a single letter (Reicher, 1969). The alternatives and stimulus remained in view until subjects responded, and subjects were under no pressure to respond quickly. In Experiments 1-3, the stimuli were presented in very small type so that they were difficult to see. Subjects were significantly more accurate with words than with nonwords, letters embedded among digits, or letters embedded among number signs (#s). In Experiments 4 and 5, the stimuli were embedded in a simultaneously present pattern mask. Subjects were significantly more accurate with words than with single letters by themselves. In the final experiment, the stimuli were presented in a mask with specific spatial frequency characteristics, and performance was significantly better with words than with nonwords. The WSE is a more general phenomenon than previously supposed; it is not limited to a tachistoscopic exposure.
Similar articles
-
Word superiority and sentence superiority effects in post-cued letter-in-string identification.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 May;87(4):1342-1352. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03059-w. Epub 2025 Apr 8. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025. PMID: 40199809 Free PMC article.
-
The PIG in sPrInG: evidence on letter grouping from the reading of buried words.Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Dec;10(4):939-46. doi: 10.3758/bf03196555. Psychon Bull Rev. 2003. PMID: 15000542
-
Identification of letters in the predesignated target paradigm: a word superiority effect for the common word the.Am J Psychol. 1990 Fall;103(3):299-315. Am J Psychol. 1990. PMID: 2221192
-
Perceiving exterior letters of words: differential influences of letter-fragment and non-letter-fragment masks.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1995 Jun;21(3):512-30. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.21.3.512. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1995. PMID: 7790831
-
The Reicher-Wheeler paradigm in word recognition research: a cautionary note on its actual contributions and published misconceptions.Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 21;15:1399237. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1399237. eCollection 2024. Front Psychol. 2024. PMID: 39498323 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The word without the tachistoscope.Percept Psychophys. 1994 Mar;55(3):296-312. doi: 10.3758/bf03207601. Percept Psychophys. 1994. PMID: 8036111
-
Don't words come easy? A psychophysical exploration of word superiority.Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Sep 4;7:519. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00519. eCollection 2013. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013. PMID: 24027510 Free PMC article.
-
The word-detection effect: sophisticated guessing or perceptual enhancement?Mem Cognit. 1996 May;24(3):331-41. doi: 10.3758/bf03213297. Mem Cognit. 1996. PMID: 8718767
-
Lexical factors in the word-superiority effect.Mem Cognit. 1995 Jan;23(1):23-33. doi: 10.3758/bf03210554. Mem Cognit. 1995. PMID: 7885263
-
Word and pseudoword superiority effects reflected in the ERP waveform.Brain Res. 2010 May 6;1329:159-74. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.02.084. Epub 2010 Mar 6. Brain Res. 2010. PMID: 20211607 Free PMC article.