Why clinicians are natural bayesians: bayesian confusion
- PMID: 15947415
- PMCID: PMC558338
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.330.7504.1390-a
Why clinicians are natural bayesians: bayesian confusion
Erratum in
- BMJ. 2005 Aug 6;331(7512):323
Figures
Comment on
-
Why clinicians are natural bayesians.BMJ. 2005 May 7;330(7499):1080-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7499.1080. BMJ. 2005. PMID: 15879401 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Hutchon DJR. Absence of nasal bone and detection of trisomy 21. Lancet 2002;359: 1343. - PubMed
-
- Hutchon DJR. Trisomy 21:91% detection rate using second-trimester ultrasound markers. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;18: 83. - PubMed
-
- Hutchon DJR, Khattab A. How to use Bayes theorem to estimate sequential conditional risks. Odds ratio or risk: that is the question! www.obgyn.net/us/us.asp?page=/us/news_articles/hutchon_bayes (accessed 24 May 2005).
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources