Lumbar spinal stenosis: indications for arthrodesis and spinal instrumentation
- PMID: 15948459
Lumbar spinal stenosis: indications for arthrodesis and spinal instrumentation
Abstract
Surgical indications for simple decompression in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis are well established. Following these guidelines, surgeons can expect good and excellent outcomes in 75% to 90% of patients. Despite the publication of many studies pertaining to the addition of arthrodesis and instrumentation, the indications for adding these procedures to a decompression are much less clear. Preoperative and intraoperative factors must be carefully considered when contemplating the addition of arthrodesis in the setting of spinal stenosis. In patients with preoperative degenerative spondylolisthesis, scoliosis, or kyphosis, and those in whom stenosis develops at a previously decompressed segment, serious consideration should be givenfor inclusion of an arthrodesis. Fusion should also be considered for those patients with stenosis adjacent to a previously fused lumbar segment. Excision of a significant portion of the facet joints or radical excision of the intervertebral disk during the course of the decompression predispose the patient to postoperative instability. The addition of an arthrodesis will likely benefit these patients. Relative indications for the use of spinal instrumentation in the setting of spinal stenosis include correction of deformity, recurrent spinal stenosis with instability, degenerative spondylolisthesis, adjacent segment stenosis with instability, and multiple level fusions.
Similar articles
-
Lumbar spinal stenosis: indications for arthrodesis and spinal instrumentation.Instr Course Lect. 1994;43:425-33. Instr Course Lect. 1994. PMID: 9097172 Review. No abstract available.
-
Spinal instrumentation in the management of degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997 Feb;(335):39-53. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997. PMID: 9020205 Review.
-
Lumbar stenosis with spondylolisthesis: current concepts of surgical treatment.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Mar;(384):54-60. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001. PMID: 11249180 Review.
-
Indications for lumbar spine fusion in the adult.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 Jun;(279):87-100. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992. PMID: 1600675 Review.
-
Lumbar spinal stenosis: surgical considerations.J South Orthop Assoc. 2002 Fall;11(3):127-34. J South Orthop Assoc. 2002. PMID: 12539936
Cited by
-
Lumbar spinal stenosis: who should be fused? An updated review.Asian Spine J. 2014 Aug;8(4):521-30. doi: 10.4184/asj.2014.8.4.521. Epub 2014 Aug 19. Asian Spine J. 2014. PMID: 25187873 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Lumbar facet distraction and fixation in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: Long-term clinical outcome and reoperation rates.J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2020 Oct-Dec;11(4):262-268. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_128_20. Epub 2020 Nov 26. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2020. PMID: 33824555 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of dynamic, semi-rigid implants on the range of motion of lumbar motion segments after decompression.Eur Spine J. 2008 Aug;17(8):1057-65. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0667-0. Epub 2008 May 21. Eur Spine J. 2008. PMID: 18493802 Free PMC article.
-
Anatomic Facet Replacement System (AFRS) Restoration of Lumbar Segment Mechanics to Intact: A Finite Element Study and In Vitro Cadaver Investigation.SAS J. 2007 Feb 1;1(1):46-54. doi: 10.1016/SASJ-2006-0010-RR. eCollection 2007. SAS J. 2007. PMID: 25802578 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term outcomes of long level posterolateral fusion in lumbar degenerative disease: comparison of long level fusion versus short level fusion: a case control study.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Dec 9;16:381. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0836-3. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015. PMID: 26646707 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical