Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2005 Jun;59(6):663-9.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2005.02429.x.

Modelling approaches to dose estimation in children

Affiliations
Review

Modelling approaches to dose estimation in children

Trevor N Johnson. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Jun.

Abstract

Most of the drugs on the market are originally developed for adults and dosage selection is based on an optimal balance between clinical efficacy and safety. The aphorism 'children are not small adults' not only holds true for the selection of suitable drugs and dosages for use in children but also their susceptibility to adverse drug reactions. Since children may not be subject to dose escalation studies similar to those carried out in the adult population, some initial estimation of dose in paediatrics should be obtained via extrapolation approaches. However, following such an exercise, well-conducted PK-PD or PK studies will still be needed to determine the most appropriate doses for neonates, infants, children and adolescents.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Representative plot showing the combined effects of dose frequency and total daily dose on the overall 24-h reduction in plasma homocysteine concentration
Figure 2
Figure 2
Paediatric drug development decision tree for types of PK-PD studies required in children (Center for Drug Evaluation and Research)
Figure 3
Figure 3
Example of a whole body Physiologically based Pharmacokinetic model
Figure 4
Figure 4
Changes in caffeine CLu (1a) and midazolam CLu (1b) with body weight (predicted CLu: median = solid line and 95% CI = dashed line; observed CLu= ellipses)
Figure 5
Figure 5
Concordance between predicted & observed caffeine CLu values (a) and midazolam CLu values (b). Variability (±95% CI) is indicated by the height and width of the ellipses

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Johnson TN. The development of drug metabolising enzymes and their influence on the susceptibility to adverse drug reactions in children. Toxicology. 2003;192:37–48. - PubMed
    1. Breant V, Charpiat B, Sab JM, Maire P, Jelliffe RW. How many patients and blood levels are necessary for population pharmacokinetic analysis? Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1996;51:283–8. - PubMed
    1. Lee PID. Design and power of a population pharmacokinetic study. Pharm Res. 2001;18:75–82. - PubMed
    1. Johnson TN, Rostami-Hodjegan A, Goddard JM, Tanner MS, Tucker GT. Contribution of midazolam and its 1-hydroxy metabolite to pre-operative sedation in children: a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2002;89:428–37. - PubMed
    1. Matthews A, Johnson TN, Rostami-Hodjegan A, Chakrapani A, Wraith JE, Moat SJ, Bonham JR, Tucker GT. An indirect response model of homocysteine suppression by betaine: optimising the dosage regimen of betaine in homocystinuria. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2002;54:140–6. - PMC - PubMed

Substances