Review
doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2005.03.004.
Clinical results of ProDisc-II lumbar total disc replacement: report from the United States clinical trial
Affiliations
- PMID: 15950690
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2005.03.004
Item in Clipboard
Review
Clinical results of ProDisc-II lumbar total disc replacement: report from the United States clinical trial
Orthop Clin North Am.
2005 Jul.
Abstract
The much-awaited clinical use of lumbar artificial discs has begun in the United States. The United States Investigational Device Exemption (US IDE) clinical trial of the ProDisc-II prosthetic disc (Synthes, Paoli, PA) was recently completed, with all indications that it meets or surpasses the test of equivalence against fusion controls. This is a review of the clinical performance of the ProDisc-II artificial disc and includes an interim report from the US IDE trial at one site.
Similar articles
-
Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up.Spine J. 2009 May;9(5):374-86. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.08.007. Epub 2008 Sep 19. Spine J. 2009. PMID: 18805066 Clinical Trial.
-
Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 May 15;32(11):1155-62; discussion 1163. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318054e377. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007. PMID: 17495770 Clinical Trial.
-
Lumbar total disc replacement part I: rationale, biomechanics, and implant types.Orthop Clin North Am. 2005 Jul;36(3):293-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2005.02.014. Orthop Clin North Am. 2005. PMID: 15950689 Review.
-
Lumbar partial disc replacement.Orthop Clin North Am. 2005 Jul;36(3):341-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2005.03.006. Orthop Clin North Am. 2005. PMID: 15950693 Review.
-
Cervical total disc replacement, part two: clinical results.Orthop Clin North Am. 2005 Jul;36(3):355-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2005.02.009. Orthop Clin North Am. 2005. PMID: 15950695
Cited by
-
The activL(®) Artificial Disc: a next-generation motion-preserving implant for chronic lumbar discogenic pain.Med Devices (Auckl). 2016 May 10;9:75-84. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S102949. eCollection 2016. Med Devices (Auckl). 2016. PMID: 27274317 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Twelve-Month Follow-up of Lumbar Spine Range of Motion Following Intervertebral Disc Replacement Using Radiostereometric Analysis.SAS J. 2008 Mar 1;2(1):9-15. doi: 10.1016/SASJ-2007-0115-RR. eCollection 2008. SAS J. 2008. PMID: 25802596 Free PMC article.
-
A meta-analysis of artificial total disc replacement versus fusion for lumbar degenerative disc disease.Eur Spine J. 2010 Aug;19(8):1250-61. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1394-x. Epub 2010 Apr 4. Eur Spine J. 2010. PMID: 20364392 Free PMC article.
-
[Current short- and long-term results of lumbar disc replacement : update 2008].Chirurg. 2008 Oct;79(10):937-43. doi: 10.1007/s00104-008-1519-5. Chirurg. 2008. PMID: 18818895 German.
-
Total disc replacement versus fusion for lumbar degenerative disc disease: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses.Eur Spine J. 2017 Mar;26(3):806-815. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4714-y. Epub 2016 Jul 23. Eur Spine J. 2017. PMID: 27448810
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
