Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2005 Jun;57(2):119-23.

Posterior tibial nerve stimulation: is the once-a-week protocol the best option?

[Article in English, Italian]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 15951736
Clinical Trial

Posterior tibial nerve stimulation: is the once-a-week protocol the best option?

[Article in English, Italian]
E Finazzi Agrò et al. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2005 Jun.

Abstract

Aim: Aim of our study was to compare the results of posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) performed weekly with those of PTNS performed 3 times per week in patients with overactive bladder syndrome.

Methods: Thirty-five patients (28 females, 7 males) with overactive bladder syndrome not responding to antimuscarinic therapy were enrolled in a prospective study. A total of 17 out of 35 patients were randomly assigned to group A and treated with a PTNS protocol based on weekly stimulation sessions; 18 out of 35 patients were randomly assigned to group B and treated with a PTNS protocol based on stimulation sessions performed 3 times per week. All subjects were evaluated by means of 24 h bladder diaries, quality of life questionnaires (I-QoL, SF36) and urodynamic evaluation before and after treatment. Patients were asked after each stimulation session to give their opinion on the efficacy of the treatment. We have considered ''success'' those patients who presented a reduction >50% of the micturition episodes/24 h (ME/24) or (if incontinent) of the incontinence episodes/24 h (IE/24). Results before and after treatments in both groups were collected and statistically compared.

Results: As a whole, 11/17 patients (63%) in group A and 12/18 patients (67%) in group B were considered ''success''; 4/11 (36%) incontinent patients in group A and 5/11 (45%) incontinent patients in group B were completely cured after treatment. In both groups, patients reported subjective improvement after 6-8 stimulation sessions.

Conclusions: Our findings seem to show that the periodicity of stimulation does not effect the results of PTNS treatment. The advantage of more frequent stimulation sessions is to achieve earlier a clinical improvement.

PubMed Disclaimer