Too much, too soon? Patients and health professionals' views concerning the impact of genetic testing at the time of breast cancer diagnosis in women under the age of 40
- PMID: 15952973
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2005.00574.x
Too much, too soon? Patients and health professionals' views concerning the impact of genetic testing at the time of breast cancer diagnosis in women under the age of 40
Abstract
Recent research suggests that women who develop breast cancer between the ages of 30-34 may have specific tumour characteristics: Those with high grade, oestrogen receptor negative, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) negative tumours have between a 10% and 27% chance of being a BRCA1 gene carrier. Carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations have an increased risk of contralateral breast cancer and cancer of the ovary. Furthermore, recent research indicates that prophylactic mastectomy and/or oophorectomy offer a significant risk reduction in the development of breast/ovarian cancer. In the near future, women in the UK may be offered the choice of a genetic test close to the time of diagnosis. This timing not only provides additional dimensions to treatment decisions, but has psycho-social and familial implications as well. This exploratory study investigates, first, whether or not women diagnosed with breast cancer under the age of 40 would want to be offered information about genetic testing close to the time of their diagnosis. Then secondly, it explores whether the health care professionals treating them support this idea. Third, it highlights the reasons for the women and the health professionals perspectives and concerns. We held focus groups of 13 women who had their only, or first, breast cancer under the age of 40 and who were subsequently identified as BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers, asking them how they felt about this timing. We also interviewed 17 health care professionals involved in various aspect of breast cancer care and cancer genetics. The majority of former breast cancer women and professionals believed that there was already emotional overload in coping with the cancer diagnosis and decisions regarding existing cancer treatment options and that offering genetic testing would add too much additional stress. Some members of both groups, however, thought that offering genetic testing around the time of breast cancer diagnosis would be more important if the results could alter treatment decisions.
Similar articles
-
Use of genetic testing and prophylactic mastectomy and oophorectomy in women with breast or ovarian cancer from families with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.J Clin Oncol. 2003 May 1;21(9):1675-81. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.09.052. J Clin Oncol. 2003. PMID: 12721241
-
Psychosocial issues following a positive result of genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations: findings from a focus group and a needs-assessment survey.CMAJ. 2001 Apr 3;164(7):1005-9. CMAJ. 2001. PMID: 11314429 Free PMC article.
-
Association between clinical characteristics and risk-reduction interventions in women who underwent BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing: a single-institution study.Cancer. 2006 Dec 15;107(12):2745-51. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22352. Cancer. 2006. PMID: 17109443
-
Attitudes and psychological impact of genetic testing, genetic counseling, and breast cancer risk assessment among women at increased risk.Oncol Nurs Forum. 2003 Mar-Apr;30(2):241-6. doi: 10.1188/03.ONF.241-246. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2003. PMID: 12692658 Review.
-
Prophylactic mastectomy and genetic testing: an update.Oncol Nurs Forum. 2000 Nov-Dec;27(10):1537-47; quiz 1548-9. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2000. PMID: 11103373 Review.
Cited by
-
Patients' willingness to reconsider cancer genetic testing after initially declining: Mention it again.J Genet Couns. 2020 Feb;29(1):18-24. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1174. Epub 2019 Sep 25. J Genet Couns. 2020. PMID: 31553110 Free PMC article.
-
Factors associated with adherence to BRCA1/2 mutation testing after oncogenetic counseling in long-surviving patients with a previous diagnosis of breast or ovarian cancer.J Community Genet. 2023 Dec;14(6):649-656. doi: 10.1007/s12687-023-00671-x. Epub 2023 Sep 19. J Community Genet. 2023. PMID: 37723374 Free PMC article.
-
Universal BRCA1/BRCA2 Testing for Ovarian Cancer Patients is Welcomed, but with Care: How Women and Staff Contextualize Experiences of Expanded Access.J Genet Couns. 2017 Dec;26(6):1280-1291. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0108-5. Epub 2017 May 24. J Genet Couns. 2017. PMID: 28540621
-
How, who, and when: preferences for delivery of genome sequencing results among women diagnosed with breast cancer at a young age.Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2016 Oct 24;4(6):684-695. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.254. eCollection 2016 Nov. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2016. PMID: 27896289 Free PMC article.
-
Concerns about cancer risk and experiences with genetic testing in a diverse population of patients with breast cancer.J Clin Oncol. 2015 May 10;33(14):1584-91. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.58.5885. Epub 2015 Apr 6. J Clin Oncol. 2015. PMID: 25847940 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous