Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Nov;54(11):1541-5.
doi: 10.1136/gut.2004.055772. Epub 2005 Jun 13.

Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography in diagnosing ascites and predicting peritoneal metastases in gastric cancer patients

Y T Lee  1 , E K W Ng, L C T Hung, S C S Chung, J Y L Ching, W Y Chan, W C Chu, J J Sung
Affiliations

Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography in diagnosing ascites and predicting peritoneal metastases in gastric cancer patients

Y T Lee et al. Gut. 2005 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Preoperative diagnosis of peritoneal metastases (PM) is difficult in patients with gastric cancer (GC).

Aims: To assess the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in diagnosing ascites and its predictability for the presence of PM in GC patients.

Subjects: Consecutive patients with newly diagnosed GC from 1998 to 2004 were studied.

Methods: All patients underwent EUS, ultrasound (US), and computed tomography (CT) scan for preoperative staging and the presence of ascites. The results were compared with operative findings. The diagnosis of PM was confirmed by histopathology or peritoneal fluid cytology.

Results: A total of 301 patients were recruited and in 250 patients the presence of ascites (n = 93) and PM (n = 71) were confirmed. EUS was more sensitive (87.1%) than combined US and CT scan examinations (16.1%) and operative findings (laparoscopy or laparotomy) (40.9%) in diagnosing ascites. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy for predicting the presence of PM were 73%, 84%, 64%, 89%, and 81% by EUS; 18%, 99%, 87%, 75%, and 76% by combining US and CT scan; and 77%, 94%, 83%, 91%, and 89% by operative findings, respectively. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, EUS detected ascites was the only significant independent predictor for the presence of PM (p<0.001; odds ratio 4.7 (95% confidence interval 2.0-11.2)).

Conclusion: EUS is a sensitive method for diagnosing ascites which is an important predictive factor for the presence of PM in GC patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Small amount of ascites (arrow) detected under the right lobe of the liver in a patient with circumferential tumour in the gastric body.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Peritoneal metastases (arrow) were detected by laparoscopy.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Study profile. EUS, endoscopic ultrasonography; CT, computed tomography; US, ultrasound.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Hayes N, Ng EK, Raimes SA, et al. Total gastrectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for “curable” stomach cancer: experience in a non-Japanese Asian center. J Am Coll Surg 1999;188:27–32. - PubMed
    1. Lundh G, Burn JI, Kolig G, et al. A co-operative international study of gastric cancer. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1974;54:219–28. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ziegler K, Sanft C, Zimmer T, et al. Comparison of computed tomography, endosonography, and intraoperative assessment in TN staging of gastric carcinoma. Gut 1993;34:604–10. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stell DA, Carter CR, Stewart I, et al. Prospective comparison of laparoscopy, ultrasonography and computed tomography in the staging of gastric cancer. Br J Surg 1996;83:1260–2. - PubMed
    1. Adachi Y, Sakino I, Matsumata T, et al. Preoperative assessment of advanced gastric carcinoma using computed tomography. Am J Gastroenterol 1997;92:872–5. - PubMed

Publication types