Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2005 Jun 20;169(6):841-6.
doi: 10.1083/jcb.200503129. Epub 2005 Jun 13.

Unzipped and loaded: the role of DNA helicases and RFC clamp-loading complexes in sister chromatid cohesion

Affiliations
Review

Unzipped and loaded: the role of DNA helicases and RFC clamp-loading complexes in sister chromatid cohesion

Robert V Skibbens. J Cell Biol. .

Abstract

It is well known that the products of chromosome replication are paired to ensure that the sisters segregate away from each other during mitosis. A key issue is how cells pair sister chromatids but preclude the catastrophic pairing of nonsister chromatids. The identification of both replication factor C and DNA helicases as critical for sister chromatid pairing has brought new insights into this fundamental process.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Replication through a ring model. DNA replication fork (Pol) passes through a huge cohesin ring (green ring), passively establishing cohesion by entrapping both sisters within a single cohesin ring.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
An active view of cohesion establishment. Sister chromatids become paired via association of separate cohesin rings after DNA replication. This model allows for separation of loci even in the presence of properly deposited cohesins, as observed at centromeres in wild-type cells and throughout chromosomes in ctf7 mutant cells. For convenience, sister pairing is depicted as ring catenation; numerous alternate ring-bridging structures (and contributions by DNA catenation) are equally plausible (Campbell and Cohen-Fix, 2002; Milutinovich and Koshland, 2003).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
A multi-step model of cohesion establishment. (Left) A subset of structural cohesins associated with DNA in G1 defines precohesion sites. Precohesion sites may be marked by cohesins that remain from the previous cell cycle or by Scc2p–Scc4p-dependent deposition. (Middle) DNA helicases (purple hexameric ring) modify precohesion complexes (broken yellow rings) or promote new cohesin deposition onto single-stranded DNA. (Right) After replication (DNA polymerase), Ct7p-RFC-PCNA (red/pink triangle–ball complex with blue PCNA disc) is posited to pair cohesin rings together, establishing cohesion between sister chromatids (ring catenation shown for simplicity). Black lines represent DNA strands; dashed lines represent RNA primers (primase not depicted) used for Okazaki fragment synthesis during lagging strand synthesis.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ahkmedov, A.T., C. Frei, M. Tasi-Pflugfelder, B. Kemper, S.M. Gasser, and R. Jessberger. 1998. Structural maintenance of chromosome protein C-terminal domains bind preferentially to DNA with secondary structure. J. Biol. Chem. 273:24088–24094. - PubMed
    1. Anderson, D.E., A. Losada, H.P. Erickson, and T. Hirano. 2002. Condensin and cohesin display different arm conformations with characteristic hinge angles. J. Cell Biol. 156:419–424. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arumugam, P., S. Gruger, K. Tanaka, C.H. Haering, K. Mechtler, and K. Nasmyth. 2003. ATP hydrolysis is required for cohesin's association with chromosomes. Curr. Biol. 13:1941–1953. - PubMed
    1. Bellows, A.M., M.A. Kenna, L. Cassimeris, and R.V. Skibbens. 2003. Human EFO1p exhibits acetyltransferase activity and is a unique combination of linker histone and Ctf7p/Eco1p chromatid cohesion establishment domains. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:6334–6343. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bjergbaek, L., J.A. Cobb, M. Tsai-Pflugfelder, and S.M. Gasser. 2005. Mechanistically distinct roles for Sgs1p in checkpoint activation and replication fork maintenance. EMBO J. 24:405–417. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types