Prognostic value of combined exercise and recovery electrocardiographic analysis
- PMID: 15956004
- DOI: 10.1001/archinte.165.11.1253
Prognostic value of combined exercise and recovery electrocardiographic analysis
Abstract
Background: Heart rate-adjusted ST-segment depression (ST/HR) analysis improves the diagnostic accuracy of exercise testing, but its prognostic value has not been evaluated in unselected populations. We prospectively used comparative exercise-recovery ST/HR analysis to predict outcome in a consecutive cohort of outpatients referred for exercise testing.
Methods: The stress-recovery index, defined as the difference between ST/HR areas during exercise and recovery,was derived in 1163 patients (median age, 60 years; interquartile range, 54-65 years). All-cause mortality and the combination of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction were target end points. The individual effect of clinical and exercise-testing data on outcome was evaluated by Cox regression analysis using separate models for each group of variables. Model validation was performed using bootstrap methods adjusted by the degree of optimism in estimates. Survival analysis was performed with the product-limit Kaplan-Meier method.
Results: During a 33-month follow-up, 48 deaths and 72 nonfatal myocardial infarctions occurred. After adjusting for confounding variables, hypertension (hazard ratio, 1.80; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-2.59), ST/HR index (hazard ratio, 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.66; for interquartile difference), and stress-recovery index (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.65-0.86; for interquartile difference) were predictive of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction, whereas hypertension (hazard ratio, 3.67; 95% confidence interval, 2.00-6.73) and stress-recovery index (hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.63; for interquartile difference) were predictive of all-cause mortality. In addition, stress-recovery index increased the prognostic power of the model on top of clinical and exercise-testing variables and provided significant discrimination for survival.
Conclusion: Combined evaluation of ST/HR analysis during exercise and recovery improves the prognostic capacity of standard exercise electrocardiography.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of the prognostic value of the stress-recovery index versus standard electrocardiographic criteria in patients with a negative exercise electrocardiogram.Am J Cardiol. 2007 Aug 15;100(4):605-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.03.068. Epub 2007 Jun 27. Am J Cardiol. 2007. PMID: 17697814
-
Exercise versus recovery electrocardiography in predicting mortality in patients with uncomplicated myocardial infarction.Eur Heart J. 2004 Apr;25(7):558-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2004.02.007. Eur Heart J. 2004. PMID: 15120052
-
The Stress-Recovery Index for the risk stratification of women with typical chest pain.Int J Cardiol. 2008 Jun 23;127(1):64-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.06.001. Epub 2007 Aug 9. Int J Cardiol. 2008. PMID: 17692413
-
An update on exercise stress testing.Curr Probl Cardiol. 2012 May;37(5):177-202. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2011.11.004. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2012. PMID: 22469057 Review.
-
Exercise electrocardiography.J La State Med Soc. 2003 Jan-Feb;155(1):26-35; quiz 35, 63. J La State Med Soc. 2003. PMID: 12656272 Review.
Cited by
-
The Finnish Cardiovascular Study (FINCAVAS): characterising patients with high risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2006 Mar 3;6:9. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-6-9. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2006. PMID: 16515696 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources