Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Sep;13(9):1055-62.
doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201450.

Communication of pharmacogenetic research results to HIV-infected treated patients: standpoints of professionals and patients

Affiliations

Communication of pharmacogenetic research results to HIV-infected treated patients: standpoints of professionals and patients

Grégoire Moutel et al. Eur J Hum Genet. 2005 Sep.

Abstract

The aim of pharmacogenetic studies is to adapt therapeutic strategies to individual genetic profiles, thus maximising their efficacy and minimising the likelihood of adverse side effects. Since the advent of personalised medicine, the issue of communicating research results to participants has become increasingly important. We addressed this question in the context of HIV infection, as patients and associations are particularly concerned by research and therapeutic advances. We explored the standpoints of both research professionals and participants involved in a pharmacogenetic study conducted in a cohort of HIV-infected patients. The setting of the research protocol was followed over a 2-year period. Participants' standpoints were collected through a questionnaire and interviews were conducted with research professionals. Of 125 participants, 76% wished to receive individual results and 71% wished to receive collective results; 39% did not know when results might be expected. Communication of global research results is a principle that is generally accepted by professionals. Concerning individual feedback, the professionals felt that it was necessary if it could be of direct benefit to the participant, but they expressed doubts for situations with no recognised benefit. Our results highlight the necessity to consider this issue in greater detail. We suggest the need to anticipate the debates concerning individual feedback, to differentiate between situations and the importance of further investigations on the opportunities and modalities of communication. Finally, our work emphasised the opposite pressures between the pursuit of scientific knowledge and the therapeutic orientation of clinical trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Quirk E, McLeod H, Powderly W. The pharmacogenetics of antiretroviral therapy: a review of studies to date. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:98–106. - PubMed
    1. Telenti A, Furrer H. [The genetics HIV cohort of the Swiss HIV Cohort Study-- facing the new challenges in medicine] Ther Umsch. 2004;61:613–618. - PubMed
    1. Galvani AP, Novembre J. The evolutionary history of the CCR5-Delta32 HIV-resistance mutation. Microbes Infect. 2005;7:302–309. - PubMed
    1. Martin AM, Nolan D, Gaudieri S, et al. Predisposition to abacavir hypersensitivity conferred by HLA-B*5701 and a haplotypic Hsp70-Hom variant. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:4180–4185. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Pharmacogenetics. Ethical Issues. 2003. http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/