Examining the factor structure of the recovery assessment scale
- PMID: 15957202
- DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a007118
Examining the factor structure of the recovery assessment scale
Abstract
This article follows up on earlier research examining the factor structure of a measure of recovery from serious mental illness. Exactly 1,824 persons with serious mental illness who were participating in the baseline interview for a multistate study on consumer-operated services completed the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) plus measures representing hope, meaning of life, quality of life, symptoms, and empowerment. Results of exploratory and subsequent confirmatory factor analyses of the RAS for random halves of the sample yielded five factors: personal confidence and hope, willingness to ask for help, goal and success orientation, reliance on others, and no domination by symptoms. Subsequent regression analyses showed that these five factors were uniquely related to the additional constructs assessed in the study. We compared these findings with those of other studies to summarize the factor structure that currently emerges on recovery.
Similar articles
-
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) for people with chronic mental illness: scale development.Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Mar;47(3):314-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.07.006. Epub 2009 Aug 12. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010. PMID: 19679304
-
Confirmatory factor analysis of the brief version of the recovery assessment scale.J Nerv Ment Dis. 2012 Oct;200(10):847-51. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e31826b6d4a. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2012. PMID: 22986276
-
Recovery assessment scale: Examining the factor structure of the German version (RAS-G) in people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders.Eur Psychiatry. 2017 Mar;41:60-67. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.10.006. Epub 2016 Dec 31. Eur Psychiatry. 2017. PMID: 28049083
-
Recovery Assessment Scale: Testing validity with Portuguese community-based mental health organization users.Psychol Assess. 2016 Mar;28(3):e1-11. doi: 10.1037/pas0000176. Epub 2015 Jun 29. Psychol Assess. 2016. PMID: 26121387
-
Mental Health Services and Personal Recovery in California: A Population-Based Analysis.Psychiatr Serv. 2020 Jun 1;71(6):580-587. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201900204. Epub 2020 Mar 2. Psychiatr Serv. 2020. PMID: 32114940 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Recovery in the USA: from politics to peer support.Int Rev Psychiatry. 2012 Feb;24(1):70-8. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2012.659659. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2012. PMID: 22385429 Free PMC article.
-
Difficulties Experienced by University Students with Severe Mental Illness Who Participate in Supported Education Programs.Community Ment Health J. 2017 Apr;53(3):281-287. doi: 10.1007/s10597-016-0026-2. Epub 2016 Jun 14. Community Ment Health J. 2017. PMID: 27299921
-
Gender differences among Indigenous Canadians experiencing homelessness and mental illness.BMC Psychol. 2019 Aug 28;7(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s40359-019-0331-y. BMC Psychol. 2019. PMID: 31455404 Free PMC article.
-
Predictors of Criminal Justice Outcomes Among Mental Health Courts Participants: The Role of Perceived Coercion and Subjective Mental Health Recovery.Int J Forensic Ment Health. 2013 Apr 1;12(2):116-125. doi: 10.1080/14999013.2013.791351. Int J Forensic Ment Health. 2013. PMID: 24039547 Free PMC article.
-
Self-stigma and the "why try" effect: impact on life goals and evidence-based practices.World Psychiatry. 2009 Jun;8(2):75-81. doi: 10.1002/j.2051-5545.2009.tb00218.x. World Psychiatry. 2009. PMID: 19516923 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical