Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2005 Jun;96(6):317-22.
doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2005.00059.x.

Chemokines in tumor progression and metastasis

Affiliations
Review

Chemokines in tumor progression and metastasis

Toshiyuki Tanaka et al. Cancer Sci. 2005 Jun.

Erratum in

  • Cancer Sci. 2005 Aug;96(8):534. Yang, Bogi [corrected to Yang, Bo-Gie]

Abstract

Although chemokines have been thought of primarily as leukocyte attractants, a growing body of evidence indicates that they also contribute to a number of tumor-related processes, such as tumor cell growth, angiogenesis/angiostasis, local invasion, and metastasis. The current knowledge of the possible involvement of chemokines and their receptors in these cellular events are reviewed here. The operating mechanism of chemokines in relation to metastatic processes in vivo are also discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The chemokine receptor signaling network. Chemokine receptors can bind and activate heterotrimeric G proteins, including Gαißγ and Gα13βγ. In a chemotaxing cell, signaling components responsible for the formation of cell polarity, directional sensing and F‐actin polymerization, such as PI3K, Rac and Cdc42, are preferentially recruited to the leading edge, whereas the mediators of actomyosin contraction, which are downstream of Rho, are recruited to the trailing edge. PTEN is excluded from the leading edge, helping to restrict PI3K signaling to the leading edge. Thus, the spatially regulated localization of signaling components plays a vital role in determining the ‘frontness’ and ‘backness’ in a chemotaxing cell. The details of the chemokine signaling pathways appear to vary slightly depending on the cellular context.

References

    1. Zlotnik A, Yoshie O. Chemokines: a new classification system and their role in immunity. Immunity 2000; 12: 121–7. - PubMed
    1. Moser B, Wolf M, Walz A, Loetscher P. Chemokines: multiple levels of leukocyte migration control. Trends Immunol 2004; 25: 75–84. - PubMed
    1. Hirsch E, Katanaev VL, Garlanda C et al. Central role for G protein‐coupled phosphoinositide 3‐kinase γ in inflammation. Science 2000; 287: 1049–53. - PubMed
    1. Curnock AP, Sotsios Y, Wright KL, Ward SG. Optimal chemotactic responses of leukemic T cells to stromal cell‐derived factor‐1 requires the activation of both class IA and IB phosphoinositide 3‐kinases. J Immunol 2003; 170: 4021–30. - PubMed
    1. Servant G, Weiner OD, Herzmark P, Balla T, Sedat JW, Bourne HR. Polarization of chemoattractant receptor signaling during neutrophil chemotaxis. Science 2000; 287: 1037–40. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types