Microtubules may harden or soften cells, depending of the extent of cell distension
- PMID: 15958232
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.07.016
Microtubules may harden or soften cells, depending of the extent of cell distension
Abstract
Experimental data show that disruption of microtubules causes cells to either become stiffer or softer. Current understanding of these behaviors is based on several different mechanisms, each of which can account for only stiffening or softening. In this study we offer a model that can explain both these features. The model is based on the cellular tensegrity idea. Key premises of the model are that cell shape stability is secured through pre-existing mechanical stress (prestress) borne by the actin cytoskeletal network, and that this prestress is partly balanced by cytoskeletal microtubules and partly by the extracellular matrix. Thus, disturbance of this balance would affect cell deformability. The model predicts that disruption of microtubules causes an increase or a decrease in cell stiffness, depending on the extent to which microtubules participate in balancing the prestress which, in turn, depends on the extent of cell spreading. In highly spread cells microtubules have a minor and negative contribution to cell stiffness, whereas in less spread cells their contribution is positive and substantial. Since in their natural habitat cells seldom exhibit highly spread forms, the above results suggest that the contribution of microtubules to cell deformability cannot be overlooked.
Similar articles
-
Effects of cytoskeletal prestress on cell rheological behavior.Acta Biomater. 2005 May;1(3):255-62. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2005.01.004. Epub 2005 Mar 29. Acta Biomater. 2005. PMID: 16701804
-
Experimental tests of the cellular tensegrity hypothesis.Biorheology. 2003;40(1-3):221-5. Biorheology. 2003. PMID: 12454408
-
Cell cytoskeleton and tensegrity.Biorheology. 2002;39(1-2):63-7. Biorheology. 2002. PMID: 12082268
-
Models of cytoskeletal mechanics of adherent cells.Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2002 Jun;1(1):95-108. doi: 10.1007/s10237-002-0009-9. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2002. PMID: 14586710 Review.
-
Cell polarity: intrinsic or externally imposed?New Biol. 1991 Jun;3(6):627-36. New Biol. 1991. PMID: 1911649 Review.
Cited by
-
Mechanical programming of arterial smooth muscle cells in health and ageing.Biophys Rev. 2021 Aug 30;13(5):757-768. doi: 10.1007/s12551-021-00833-6. eCollection 2021 Oct. Biophys Rev. 2021. PMID: 34745374 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Multi-scale mechanics from molecules to morphogenesis.Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2009 Nov;41(11):2147-62. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2009.04.015. Epub 2009 Apr 24. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2009. PMID: 19394436 Free PMC article. Review.
-
HtrA1 Mediated Intracellular Effects on Tubulin Using a Polarized RPE Disease Model.EBioMedicine. 2018 Jan;27:258-274. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.12.011. Epub 2017 Dec 13. EBioMedicine. 2018. PMID: 29269042 Free PMC article.
-
A structural bio-chemo-mechanical model for vascular smooth muscle cell traction force microscopy.Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2023 Aug;22(4):1221-1238. doi: 10.1007/s10237-023-01713-6. Epub 2023 Apr 1. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2023. PMID: 37004657 Free PMC article.
-
Using Polyacrylamide Hydrogels to Model Physiological Aortic Stiffness Reveals that Microtubules Are Critical Regulators of Isolated Smooth Muscle Cell Morphology and Contractility.Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jan 27;13:836710. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.836710. eCollection 2022. Front Pharmacol. 2022. PMID: 35153800 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources