Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 May;21(5):212-9.
doi: 10.1016/s1607-551x(09)70190-1.

Predicting the grade of disabilty 1 year after stroke following rehabilitation

Affiliations

Predicting the grade of disabilty 1 year after stroke following rehabilitation

Jau-Hong Lin et al. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2005 May.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify predictors of grades of disability at least 1 year after stroke rehabilitation therapy. We recruited stroke patients from the inpatient rehabilitation department of a university hospital. The degree of disability was graded using the disability evaluation at least 1 year after stroke onset. Functional ability was evaluated using the Functional Independence Measure instrument on admission, on discharge from the inpatient rehabilitation program, and at the 6-month follow-up visit after discharge. Major sociodemographic, medical, and rehabilitative factors were also collected during the hospitalization period. Of the 109 patients surveyed, 64 (58.7%) had severe or very severe grades of disability. The correlates of severe or very severe disability in logistic regression analyses were bilaterally affected (odds ratio, OR, 10.8), impaired orientation (OR, 3.6), and poorer functional ability at discharge (OR, 7.6). Based on the significant predictors identified, the logistic regression model correctly classified severe or very severe disability in 68.0% of subjects. The higher frequency of severe or very severe disability in this study may have been due to the relatively more severely affected stroke patient population in the inpatient rehabilitation service and the use of unique disability evaluation criteria. These results may provide information useful in planning continuous rehabilitation care and setting relevant socio-welfare policies for stroke victims.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Iwanenko W, Fiedler RC, Granger CV. Uniform data system for medical rehabilitation: report of first admissions to subacute rehabilitation for 1995, 1996 and 1997. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1999; 78: 384–388. - PubMed
    1. Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, et al. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part 1: outcome. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995; 76: 399–405. - PubMed
    1. Lin SH. Home health care and social supports for community‐ dwelling stroke patients. J Formos Med Assoc. 1993; 92 (Suppl 4): 177–183 –[In Chinese]. - PubMed
    1. Clarke PJ, Black SE, Badley EM, et al. Handicap in stroke survivors. Disabil Rehabil. 1999; 21: 116–123. - PubMed
    1. Patrick DL. A socio‐medical approach to disablement. In Patrick DL, Peach H, eds. Disablement in the Community. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1989, 1–18.

Publication types