Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2005;6(6):113.
doi: 10.1186/gb-2005-6-6-113. Epub 2005 May 31.

Histone modifications: from genome-wide maps to functional insights

Affiliations
Review

Histone modifications: from genome-wide maps to functional insights

Fred van Leeuwen et al. Genome Biol. 2005.

Abstract

A large number of histone modifications has been implicated in the regulation of gene expression. Together, these modifications have the potential to form a complex combinatorial regulatory code. Genome-wide mapping approaches provide new opportunities to decipher this code, but they may suffer from systematic biases. Integration of datasets and improved technologies will provide the way forward.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Two models for the role of the different histone modifications. (a) Histone modifications are linked, such that all active genes are marked by an identical combination of 'active' histone modifications, and all inactive genes by another common set of 'repressive' histone modifications. (b) Histone modifications are not linked but form a complex combinatorial code, such that various combinations of modifications mark (groups of) active genes, and various other combinations mark inactive genes. Note that some organisms (such as budding yeast) may lack 'repressive' histone modifications.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effect of nucleosome distribution on chromatin immunoprecipitation. Uneven genomic distribution of nucleosomes (a) may cause a bias in the results of chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments (b). The bias may be solved by including ChIP controls for nucleosome density (see text) and subsequent normalization of the histone-modification ChIP data.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison of the correlations of ChIP of each lysine acetylation with nucleosome density and with gene expression levels. Data are from Table 1.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Peterson CL, Laniel MA. Histones and histone modifications. Curr Biol. 2004;14:R546–R551. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.07.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Khorasanizadeh S. The nucleosome: from genomic organization to genomic regulation. Cell. 2004;116:259–272. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00044-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brehm A, Tufteland KR, Aasland R, Becker PB. The many colours of chromodomains. BioEssays. 2004;26:133–140. doi: 10.1002/bies.10392. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zeng L, Zhou MM. Bromodomain: an acetyl-lysine binding domain. FEBS Lett. 2002;513:124–128. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(01)03309-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carmen AA, Milne L, Grunstein M. Acetylation of the yeast histone H4 N terminus regulates its binding to heterochromatin protein SIR3. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:4778–4781. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110532200. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources