Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Jul;2(3):A10.
Epub 2005 Jun 15.

The National Program of Cancer Registries: explaining state variations in average cost per case reported

Affiliations

The National Program of Cancer Registries: explaining state variations in average cost per case reported

Hannah K Weir et al. Prev Chronic Dis. 2005 Jul.

Abstract

Introduction: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Program of Cancer Registries is a federally funded surveillance program that provides support and assistance to state and territorial health departments for the operation of cancer registries. The objective of this study was to identify factors associated with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's costs to report cancer cases during the first 5 years of the National Program of Cancer Registries.

Methods: Information on expenditures and number of cases reported through the National Program of Cancer Registries was used to estimate the average cost per case reported for each state program. Additional information was obtained from other sources, and regression analyses were used to assess the contribution of each factor.

Results: Average costs of the National Program of Cancer Registries differed substantially among programs and were inversely associated with the number of cases reported (P < .001). The geographic area of the state was positively associated with the cost (P = .01), as was the regional cost of living (P = .08), whereas the program type (i.e., enhancement or planning) was inversely associated with cost (P = .08).

Conclusion: The apparent existence of economies of scale suggests that contiguous state programs might benefit from sharing infrastructure and other fixed costs, such as database management resources, depending on the geographic area and population size served. Sharing database management resources might also promote uniform data collection and quality control practices, reduce the information-sharing burden among states, and allow more resources to be used for other cancer prevention and control activities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Federal funding and data collection and reporting activities of state cancer registries supported by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) during the first 5-year project period. Data from 43 states and the District of Columbia are included.
This figure shows the observed and predicted log average National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) cost per case (x-axis) compared with the log of the number of cases reported (y-axis) for programs participating in the first 5-year funding period of the program. The model contained the average annual number of cancer cases reported, area (per 1000 sq miles), NPCR program type (enhancement or planning), and the 2000 consumer price index. The observed cost per cases is plotted with the predicted cost per case and shows that the average annual funds spent, annual number of cases reported, and average NPCR cost per case reported vary substantially among programs. The log average cost per case decreases as the log average of the total number of cases increases. In addition, the figure shows that numerous registries were spending more or less than predicted to report a case of cancer.
Figure 2
Observed and predicted log average National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) cost per case reported compared with the log of number of cases reported for programs participating in the first 5-year funding period of the program. Model contained average annual number of cancer cases reported, area (per 1000 sq miles), NPCR program type (enhancement or planning), and the 2000 consumer price index.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute . Fact book; fiscal year 2003. Bethesda (MD): National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; 2003.
    1. Wingo PA, Ries LA, Rosenberg HM, Miller DS, Edwards BK. Cancer incidence and mortality, 1973-1995: a report card for the U.S. Cancer. 1998;82:1197–1207. - PubMed
    1. Wingo PA, Ries LA, Giovino GA, Miller DS, Rosenberg HM, Shopland DR, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1973-1996, with a special section on lung cancer and tobacco smoking. J Nat Cancer Inst. 1999;91:675–690. - PubMed
    1. Ries LA, Wingo PA, Miller DS, Howe HL, Weir HK, Rosenberg HM, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1973-1997, with a special section on colorectal cancer. Cancer. 2000;88:2398–2424. - PubMed
    1. Howe HL, Wingo PA, Thun MJ, Ries LA, Rosenberg HM, Feigal EG, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer (1973 through 1998), featuring cancers with recent increasing trends. J Nat Cancer Inst. 2001;93:824–842. - PubMed