Hemodynamic comparison of bioprostheses for complete supra-annular position in patients with small aortic annulus
- PMID: 15963409
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.03.039
Hemodynamic comparison of bioprostheses for complete supra-annular position in patients with small aortic annulus
Abstract
Objectives: The present study evaluates complete supra-annular bioprostheses in patients with an aortic annulus of 18 to 23 mm in diameter.
Background: Aortic valve replacement in patients with small aortic annulus using stented bioprostheses is often associated with unsatisfactory hemodynamic results and high incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch.
Methods: Between February 2000 and January 2004, 156 patients with aortic valve disease and an aortic annulus of 18 to 23 mm in diameter received the stented bovine Soprano (Sorin Biomedica Cardio, Saluggia, Italy) (n = 18), Perimount (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) (n = 52), Perimount Magna (Edwards Lifesciences) (n = 42), or the stented porcine Mosaic (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota) (n = 44) bioprostheses. Intraoperatively, the surgeon measured the aortic annulus diameter by inserting a hegar dilator. Thus, postoperative hemodynamic results could be referred to the patient's aortic annulus diameter instead of referring the results to the labeled valve size. This allows for objective comparisons between different valve types.
Results: There was no significant difference in hemodynamic results between the different valve types in patients with an aortic annulus 18 to 20 mm. In patients with an annulus 21 to 23 mm, the Magna was significantly superior to the other investigated devices in mean pressure gradient, effective orifice area, and incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch. There was no significant difference between the complete supra-annular bioprostheses Mosaic and Soprano and the intra-supra-annular Perimount valve.
Conclusions: In patients with an aortic annulus of 18 to 20 mm in diameter, hemodynamic performance is independent of the implanted stented valve type and the annular position. Root enlargement or stentless valves may be beneficial alternatives. Patients with annulus diameter 21 to 23 mm benefit from the Magna in complete supra-annular position leading to superior hemodynamic results.
Comment in
-
Comparison of bioprostheses in patients with small aortic annulus.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Mar 7;47(5):1088; author reply 1088. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.12.010. Epub 2006 Feb 9. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006. PMID: 16516104 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 May;133(5):1234-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.10.074. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007. PMID: 17467435
-
The effective orifice area/patient aortic annulus area ratio: a better way to compare different bioprostheses? A prospective randomized comparison of the Mosaic and Perimount bioprostheses in the aortic position.J Heart Valve Dis. 2004 May;13(3):382-8; discussion 388-9. J Heart Valve Dis. 2004. PMID: 15222284 Clinical Trial.
-
The Toronto root stentless valve in the subcoronary position is hemodynamically superior to the mosaic stented completely supra-annular bioprosthesis.J Heart Valve Dis. 2005 Nov;14(6):814-21; discussion 821. J Heart Valve Dis. 2005. PMID: 16359064
-
Assessing options for the small aortic root.J Heart Valve Dis. 2002 Jan;11 Suppl 1:S50-5. J Heart Valve Dis. 2002. PMID: 11843521 Review.
-
Patient-prosthesis mismatch: the Japanese experience.Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Jun;12(3):159-65. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006. PMID: 16823327 Review.
Cited by
-
Prosthesis-patient mismatch: definition, clinical impact, and prevention.Heart. 2006 Aug;92(8):1022-9. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2005.067363. Epub 2005 Oct 26. Heart. 2006. PMID: 16251232 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Significant intra-valvular pressure loss across EPIC SUPRA and perimount magna supra-annular designed aortic bioprostheses in patients with normal aortic size.Indian Heart J. 2017 Jan-Feb;69(1):87-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2016.06.001. Epub 2016 Jun 11. Indian Heart J. 2017. PMID: 28228313 Free PMC article.
-
Prediction of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch prior to aortic valve replacement: which is the best method?Heart. 2007 May;93(5):615-20. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2006.102764. Epub 2006 Dec 12. Heart. 2007. PMID: 17164480 Free PMC article.
-
Exercise hemodynamics in valvular heart disease.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2011 Jun;13(3):226-33. doi: 10.1007/s11886-011-0169-2. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2011. PMID: 21318342 Review.
-
Aortic valve replacement with the Cardioprotese Premium bovine pericardium bioprosthesis: four-year clinical results.Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012 Aug;15(2):229-34. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivs166. Epub 2012 May 15. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012. PMID: 22588029 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical