Implementation of a Health Impact Assessment (HIA) tool in a regional health organization in Sweden--a feasibility study
- PMID: 15964887
- DOI: 10.1093/heapro/dai009
Implementation of a Health Impact Assessment (HIA) tool in a regional health organization in Sweden--a feasibility study
Abstract
During the last decade, Health Impact Assessment (HIA) has been discussed worldwide as being an important tool for the development of healthy public policy. In Sweden, the Swedish Federation of County Councils and the Swedish Association of Local Authorities have taken the initiative to and are responsible for the development of an HIA tool concerning proposed policy decisions at local and regional levels. The HIA tool was developed as three different templates to be adapted to local conditions and needs: the Health Question, the Health Matrix and the Health Impact Analysis. In this paper we present a feasibility study of the experiences of implementing this HIA tool at regional level in a Health Care District (SWHCD) of Stockholm County Council, based on an inductive approach and on principles of data triangulation. The main findings include the need for continuous revision of the HIA templates during the pilot period. The following factors were instrumental in successfully using the HIA tool in local policy making and management: political consensus, agreement between politicians and public officials on political intentions, a clear- cut decision from management, and offering an opportunity for training. Respondents felt that all public officials should use the HIA as part of their normal work routines. In conclusion, the HIA tool has to be locally adapted and the implementation process has to include close collaboration between politicians and public officials and be followed by continuing education, providing possibilities for a dialogue around the HIA tool, in order to ensure the quality of the instrument. Implications of the study are that the process of developing the tool has worked well but that the possible impacts of its use in this case remain an open question. However, this was not the focus of our study.
Similar articles
-
Window of opportunity for intersectoral health policy in Sweden--open, half-open or half-shut?Health Promot Int. 2007 Dec;22(4):307-15. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dam028. Epub 2007 Oct 18. Health Promot Int. 2007. PMID: 17947345
-
Review article: health impact assessment developments in Sweden.Scand J Public Health. 2010 Mar;38(2):115-20. doi: 10.1177/1403494809357097. Epub 2010 Jan 7. Scand J Public Health. 2010. PMID: 20056783 Review.
-
Health impact assessment of agriculture and food policies: lessons learnt from the Republic of Slovenia.Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81(6):391-8. Epub 2003 Jul 25. Bull World Health Organ. 2003. PMID: 12894321 Free PMC article.
-
Screening tool development for health impact assessment of large administrative structural changes.Scand J Public Health. 2008 Nov;36(8):789-94. doi: 10.1177/1403494808089556. Epub 2008 Aug 6. Scand J Public Health. 2008. PMID: 18684781
-
Evaluating health impact assessment.Public Health. 2004 Dec;118(8):544-52. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2003.10.012. Public Health. 2004. PMID: 15530933 Review.
Cited by
-
The future of public health policymaking after COVID-19: a qualitative systematic review of lessons from Health in All Policies.Open Res Eur. 2021 Jul 21;1:23. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.13178.2. eCollection 2021. Open Res Eur. 2021. PMID: 37645203 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources