The effect of digital image resolution and compression on anterior eye imaging
- PMID: 15965160
- PMCID: PMC1772706
- DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2004.062240
The effect of digital image resolution and compression on anterior eye imaging
Abstract
Aim: To determine the theoretical and clinical minimum image pixel resolution and maximum compression appropriate for anterior eye image storage.
Methods: Clinical images of the bulbar conjunctiva, palpebral conjunctiva, and corneal staining were taken at the maximum resolution of Nikon:CoolPix990 (2048x1360 pixels), DVC:1312C (1280x811), and JAI:CV-S3200 (767x569) single chip cameras and the JVC:KYF58 (767x569) three chip camera. The images were stored in TIFF format and further copies created with reduced resolution or compressed. The images were then ranked for clarity on a 15 inch monitor (resolution 1280 x 1024) by 20 optometrists and analysed by objective image analysis grading. Theoretical calculation of the resolution necessary to detect the smallest objects of clinical interest was also conducted.
Results: Theoretical calculation suggested that the minimum resolution should be > or = 579 horizontal pixels at 25x magnification. Image quality was perceived subjectively as being reduced when the pixel resolution was lower than 767 x 569 (p<0.005) or the image was compressed as a BMP or <50% quality JPEG (p<0.005). Objective image analysis techniques were less susceptible to changes in image quality, particularly when using colour extraction techniques.
Conclusion: It is appropriate to store anterior eye images at between 1280 x 811 and 767 x 569 pixel resolution and at up to 1:70 JPEG compression.
Figures
References
-
- Charman WN. Imaging in the 21st century. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1998;18:210–23. - PubMed
-
- George LD, Leverton C, Young S, et al. Can digitised colour 35 mm transparencies be used to diagnose diabetic retinopathy? Diabet Med 1997;14:970–3. - PubMed
-
- Lim JI, Labree L, Nichols T, et al. Comparison of nonmydriatic digitized video fundus images with standard 35-mm slides to screen for and identify specific lesions of age-related macular degeneration. Retina 2002;22:59–64. - PubMed
-
- Prasad S, Bannon P, Clearkin LG, et al. Digital fundus imaging: a quality and cost comparison with 35-mm film. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1999;77:79–82. - PubMed
-
- Olson JA, Strachan FM, Hipwell JH, et al. A comparative evaluation of digital imaging, retinal photography and optometrist examination in screening for diabetic retinopathy. Diabet Med 2003;20:528–34. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources