Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Jul;89(7):828-30.
doi: 10.1136/bjo.2004.062240.

The effect of digital image resolution and compression on anterior eye imaging

Affiliations

The effect of digital image resolution and compression on anterior eye imaging

R C Peterson et al. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 Jul.

Abstract

Aim: To determine the theoretical and clinical minimum image pixel resolution and maximum compression appropriate for anterior eye image storage.

Methods: Clinical images of the bulbar conjunctiva, palpebral conjunctiva, and corneal staining were taken at the maximum resolution of Nikon:CoolPix990 (2048x1360 pixels), DVC:1312C (1280x811), and JAI:CV-S3200 (767x569) single chip cameras and the JVC:KYF58 (767x569) three chip camera. The images were stored in TIFF format and further copies created with reduced resolution or compressed. The images were then ranked for clarity on a 15 inch monitor (resolution 1280 x 1024) by 20 optometrists and analysed by objective image analysis grading. Theoretical calculation of the resolution necessary to detect the smallest objects of clinical interest was also conducted.

Results: Theoretical calculation suggested that the minimum resolution should be > or = 579 horizontal pixels at 25x magnification. Image quality was perceived subjectively as being reduced when the pixel resolution was lower than 767 x 569 (p<0.005) or the image was compressed as a BMP or <50% quality JPEG (p<0.005). Objective image analysis techniques were less susceptible to changes in image quality, particularly when using colour extraction techniques.

Conclusion: It is appropriate to store anterior eye images at between 1280 x 811 and 767 x 569 pixel resolution and at up to 1:70 JPEG compression.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean subjective ranking for each camera model’s resolution range. Error bars = 1 SD (n = 20).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean subjective ranking for each camera model’s compression range. Error bars = 1 SD (n = 20).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean objective edge detection and colouration grading for each camera model’s resolution range. Error bars = 1 SD.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean objective edge detection and colouration grading for each camera model’s compression range. Error bars = 1 SD.

References

    1. Charman WN. Imaging in the 21st century. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1998;18:210–23. - PubMed
    1. George LD, Leverton C, Young S, et al. Can digitised colour 35 mm transparencies be used to diagnose diabetic retinopathy? Diabet Med 1997;14:970–3. - PubMed
    1. Lim JI, Labree L, Nichols T, et al. Comparison of nonmydriatic digitized video fundus images with standard 35-mm slides to screen for and identify specific lesions of age-related macular degeneration. Retina 2002;22:59–64. - PubMed
    1. Prasad S, Bannon P, Clearkin LG, et al. Digital fundus imaging: a quality and cost comparison with 35-mm film. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1999;77:79–82. - PubMed
    1. Olson JA, Strachan FM, Hipwell JH, et al. A comparative evaluation of digital imaging, retinal photography and optometrist examination in screening for diabetic retinopathy. Diabet Med 2003;20:528–34. - PubMed

MeSH terms