Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2005 Jul;89(7):847-50.
doi: 10.1136/bjo.2004.056614.

A comparison of four methods of tonometry: method agreement and interobserver variability

P-A Tonnu  1 , T Ho, K Sharma, E White, C Bunce, D Garway-Heath
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A comparison of four methods of tonometry: method agreement and interobserver variability

P-A Tonnu et al. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 Jul.

Abstract

Aim: To compare the inter-method agreement in intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements made with four different tonometric methods.

Methods: IOP was measured with the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), Tono-Pen XL, ocular blood flow tonograph (OBF), and Canon TX-10 non-contact tonometer (NCT) in a randomised order in one eye of each of 105 patients with ocular hypertension or glaucoma. Three measurements were made with each method, and by each of two independent GAT observers. GAT interobserver and tonometer inter-method agreement was assessed by the Bland-Altman method. The outcome measures were 95% limits of agreement for IOP measurements between GAT observers and between tonometric methods, and 95% confidence intervals for intra-session repeated measurements.

Results: The mean differences (bias) in IOP measurements were 0.4 mm Hg between GAT observers, and 0.6 mm Hg, 0.1 mm Hg, and 0.7 mm Hg between GAT and Tono-Pen, OBF, and NCT, respectively. The 95% limits of agreement were smallest (bias +/-2.6 mm Hg) between GAT observers, and larger for agreement between the GAT and the Tono-Pen, OBF, and NCT (bias +/-6.7, +/-5.5, and +/-4.8 mm Hg, respectively). The OBF and NCT significantly underestimated GAT measurements at lower IOP and overestimated these at higher IOP. The repeatability coefficients for intra-session repeated measurement for each method were +/-2.2 mm Hg and +/-2.5 mm Hg for the GAT, +/-4.3 mm Hg for the Tono-Pen, +/-3.7 mm Hg for the OBF, and +/-3.2 mm Hg for the NCT.

Conclusions: There was good interobserver agreement with the GAT and moderate agreement between the NCT and GAT. The differences between the GAT and OBF and between the GAT and Tono-Pen probably preclude the OBF and Tono-Pen from routine clinical use as objective methods to measure IOP in normal adult eyes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Box plot of inter-method differences. The box represents the interquartile range which contains the 50% of values. The line across the box indicates the median. The whiskers are lines that extend from the box to the highest and lowest values, excluding outliers. Circles indicate outliers.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, et al. The ocular hypertension treatment study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:714–20. - PubMed
    1. Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, et al. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:1268–79. - PubMed
    1. Walia JS, Chronister CL. Possible iatrogenic transmission of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease via tonometer tips: a review of the literature. Optometry 2001;72:649–52. - PubMed
    1. Desai SP, Sivakumar S, Fryers PT. Evaluation of a disposable prism for applanation tonometry. Eye 2001;15:279–82. - PubMed
    1. Geyer O, Mayron Y, Loewenstein A, et al. Tono-Pen tonometry in normal and in post-keratoplasty eyes. Br J Ophthalmol 1992;76:538–40. - PMC - PubMed