Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Jul 2;331(7507):19.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.38488.385995.8F. Epub 2005 Jun 20.

Fate of biomedical research protocols and publication bias in France: retrospective cohort study

Evelyne Decullier  1 , Véronique Lhéritier, François Chapuis
Affiliations

Fate of biomedical research protocols and publication bias in France: retrospective cohort study

Evelyne Decullier et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the fate of protocols approved by the French research ethics committees, a national system created by the French 1988 Huriet-Sérusclat Act; to assess publication bias at a national level.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Representative sample of 25/48 French research ethics committees in 1994. PROTOCOLS: 649 research protocols approved by committees, with follow-up information.

Main outcome measures: Protocols' initial characteristics (design, study size, investigator) abstracted from committees' archives; follow-up information (rates of initiation, completion, and publication) obtained from mailed questionnaire to principal investigators.

Results: Completed questionnaires were available for 649/976 (69%) protocols. Of these, 581 (90%) studies were initiated, 501/581 (86%) were completed, and 190/501 (38%) were published. Studies with confirmatory results were more likely to be published as scientific papers than were studies with inconclusive results (adjusted odds ratio 4.59, 95% confidence interval 2.21 to 9.54). Moreover, studies with confirmatory results were published more quickly than studies with inconclusive results (hazard ratio 2.48, 1.36 to 4.55).

Conclusion: At a national level, too many research studies are not completed, and among those completed too many are not published. We suggest capitalising on research ethics committees to register and follow all authorised research on human participants on a systematic and prospective basis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Fate of biomedical research protocols
Fig 2
Fig 2
Time elapsed to publication
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Shields PG. Publication bias is a scientific problem with adverse ethical outcomes: the case for a section for null results. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev >2000;9: 771-2. - PubMed
    1. Chalmers I. Underreporting research is scientific misconduct. JAMA >1990;263: 1405-8. - PubMed
    1. Dickersin K. The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence. JAMA >1990;263: 1385-9. - PubMed
    1. Simes RJ. Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials. J Clin Oncol >1986;4: 1529-41. - PubMed
    1. Pich J, Carne X, Arnaiz JA, Gomez B, Trilla A, Rodes J. Role of a research ethics committee in follow-up and publication of results. Lancet >2003;361: 1015-6. - PubMed

Publication types