Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Jun;55(515):458-60.

Value of histopathologic analysis of skin excisions by GPs

Affiliations

Value of histopathologic analysis of skin excisions by GPs

Pieter A J Buis et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2005 Jun.

Abstract

The clinical diagnoses of skin lesions in general practice may sometimes not be very accurate. The aim of this study was to compare clinical versus final histopathological diagnosis status (benign, pre-malignant/malignant) in 4595 consecutive submissions by GPs. The final diagnosis was pre-malignant or malignant in 215 cases (4.7%). From the 4436 lesions clinically diagnosed as benign, 134 (3.0%) were pre-malignant or malignant on final histological diagnosis. From the 159 lesions clinically diagnosed as pre-malignant or malignant, 78 (49.1%) were in fact benign, and 81 (50.9%) were indeed pre-malignant or malignant on final diagnosis. The sensitivity for a malignant diagnosis was 38%, and the specificity 98%. The proportion of pre-malignancies or malignancies was 0.9% below and 9.2% above the age of 40 years. In conclusion, histopathological investigation of skin excisions by GPs yields a high percentage of unexpected pre-malignancies and malignancies. The number of misdiagnoses was age dependent, with a proportion of 1% and 9% of pre-malignancies/malignancies in patients below and above the age of 40 years, respectively. This indicates that all skin excisions by GPs must undergo routine histopathological investigation to ensure that serious malignancies are not missed.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. O'Cathain A, Brazier JE, Milner A, Fall M. The cost-effectiveness of minor surgery in general practice: a prospective comparison with hospital practice. Br J Gen Pract. 1992;42:13–17. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lowy A, Brazier J, Fall M, et al. Quality of minor surgery by general practitioners in 1990 and 1991. Br J Gen Pract. 1994;44:364–365. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eulderink F. How accurate is the clinical diagnosis in skin tumours removed by the family physician, surgeon or dermatologist? [Hoe juist is de klinische diagnose bij huidtumoren verwijderd door huisarts, chirurg en dermatoloog?] (Dutch) Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1994;138:1618–1622. - PubMed
    1. Federman DG, Concato J, Kirsner RS. Comparison of dermatologic diagnoses by primary care practitioners and dermatologists. A review of the literature. Arch Fam Med. 1999;8:170–172. - PubMed
    1. Lowy A, Willis D, Abrams K. Is histological examination of tissue removed by general practitioners always necessary? Before and after comparison of detection rates of serious skin lesions. BMJ. 1997;315:406–408. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms