Development of light ion therapy at the Karolinska Hospital and Institute
- PMID: 15971343
- DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(04)80049-5
Development of light ion therapy at the Karolinska Hospital and Institute
Abstract
Recent developments in radiation therapy have made it possible to optimize the high dose region to cover almost any target volume and shape at the same time as the dose level to adjacent organs at risk is acceptable. Further implementations of IMRT (Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy), and inverse treatment planning using already available technologies but also foreseeable improved design of therapy accelerators delivering electron- and photon beams, will bring these advances to the benefit of a broad population of cancer patients. Protons will therefore generally not be needed since in most situations the improvement will be insignificant or moderate due to the large lateral penumbra with deep proton therapy. A further step would be to use He-ions, which have only half the penumbra width of protons and still a fairly low-LET in the spread-out Bragg peak. There is however still a group of patients that cannot be helped by these advances as the tumor might be radioresistant for the presently utilized low ionization density beam qualities. The ultimate step in the therapy development process should therefore be to optimize the beam quality for each tumor-normal tissue situation. To facilitate beam quality optimization light ions are needed. It is argued that in many radioresistant tumors a dose-mean LET of 25-50 eV/nm in the target would be optimum as then tumor cells will be lost in the highest proportion through apoptotic cell kill and the superficial tissues will still be irradiated with a fairly low LET. Light ions using Li, Be, B, and C would then be the ideal choice. In this paper a light ion facility is outlined for the Karolinska University Hospital facilitating both dose distribution and beam quality optimization.
Similar articles
-
Recent advances in light ion radiation therapy.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Feb 1;58(2):603-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.09.034. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004. PMID: 14751534 Review.
-
Design of a fast multileaf collimator for radiobiological optimized IMRT with scanned beams of photons, electrons, and light ions.Med Phys. 2007 Mar;34(3):877-88. doi: 10.1118/1.2431082. Med Phys. 2007. PMID: 17441233
-
Proton beams to replace photon beams in radical dose treatments.Acta Oncol. 2003;42(8):800-8. doi: 10.1080/02841860310017676. Acta Oncol. 2003. PMID: 14968940
-
Should positive phase III clinical trial data be required before proton beam therapy is more widely adopted? No.Radiother Oncol. 2008 Feb;86(2):148-53. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.12.024. Epub 2008 Jan 30. Radiother Oncol. 2008. PMID: 18237800
-
Clinical and radiobiological advantages of single-dose stereotactic light-ion radiation therapy for large intracranial arteriovenous malformations. Technical note.J Neurosurg. 2009 Nov;111(5):919-26. doi: 10.3171/2007.10.17205. J Neurosurg. 2009. PMID: 19392591 Review.
Cited by
-
A systems biology approach to radiation therapy optimization.Radiat Environ Biophys. 2010 May;49(2):111-24. doi: 10.1007/s00411-010-0268-2. Epub 2010 Feb 27. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2010. PMID: 20191284 Review.
-
A Review of Controversial Issues in the Management of Head and Neck Cancer: A Swiss Multidisciplinary and Multi-Institutional Patterns of Care Study-Part 4 (Biomarkers).Front Oncol. 2019 Oct 24;9:1128. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01128. eCollection 2019. Front Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31709188 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical