A behavior systems view of the organization of multiple responses during a partially or continuously reinforced interfood clock
- PMID: 15971497
- DOI: 10.3758/bf03196054
A behavior systems view of the organization of multiple responses during a partially or continuously reinforced interfood clock
Abstract
We examined how a 50% Pavlovian partial reinforcement (PRF) schedule, versus a 100% continuous reinforcement (CRF) schedule, altered the asymptotic amount and distribution of focal and general search behavior in rats during 48-sec trials with and without a four-segment interfood clock (S1-S2-S3-S4-US). Under CRF, but not PRF, average asymptotic focal search (nosing in the feeder) increased across the last two clock segments (S3 and S4), and more for the clock group than the no-clock group. Locomotor general search peaked in the second clock segment (S2) for the CRF-clock and CRF-no-clock groups and in S3 for the PRF-clock groups. Furthermore, the ratio of general search to maximum focal search was higher for the PRF-clock group than for the CRF-clock group. This pattern of results supports the view that predictable reward presentations temporally organize search states and related responses between food presentations. The relative expression of these responses varies with the predictability and proximity of reward and is more sharply defined in the presence of a clock.
Similar articles
-
The partial-reinforcement extinction effect does not result from reduced sensitivity to nonreinforcement.J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2019 Apr;45(2):185-202. doi: 10.1037/xan0000200. J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2019. PMID: 30945926
-
The partial reinforcement extinction effect: The proportion of trials reinforced during conditioning predicts the number of trials to extinction.J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2019 Jan;45(1):43-58. doi: 10.1037/xan0000190. J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2019. PMID: 30604994
-
Conditioned inhibitory effects of discriminated Pavlovian training with food in rats depend on interactions of search modes, related repertoires, and response measures.Anim Learn Behav. 2002 Aug;30(3):217-27. doi: 10.3758/bf03192831. Anim Learn Behav. 2002. PMID: 12391788
-
Differences between behavior reinforced by electrical stimulation of the brain and conventionally reinforced behavior: as associative analysis.Psychol Bull. 1972 Aug;78(2):103-18. doi: 10.1037/h0032975. Psychol Bull. 1972. PMID: 4558985 Review. No abstract available.
-
Extinction of Pavlovian conditioning: The influence of trial number and reinforcement history.Behav Processes. 2017 Aug;141(Pt 1):19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.04.017. Epub 2017 May 1. Behav Processes. 2017. PMID: 28473250 Review.
Cited by
-
Do rats learn conditional independence?R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Feb 8;4(2):160994. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160994. eCollection 2017 Feb. R Soc Open Sci. 2017. PMID: 28386451 Free PMC article.
-
Acquisition of "Start" and "Stop" response thresholds in peak-interval timing is differentially sensitive to protein synthesis inhibition in the dorsal and ventral striatum.Front Integr Neurosci. 2012 Mar 14;6:10. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2012.00010. eCollection 2012. Front Integr Neurosci. 2012. PMID: 22435054 Free PMC article.
-
Time to rethink the neural mechanisms of learning and memory.Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2014 Feb;108:136-44. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2013.11.019. Epub 2013 Dec 3. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2014. PMID: 24309167 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Space, time, and context drive anticipatory behavior: Considerations for understanding the behavior of animals in human care.Front Vet Sci. 2022 Sep 6;9:972217. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.972217. eCollection 2022. Front Vet Sci. 2022. PMID: 36148468 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Timing and anticipation: conceptual and methodological approaches.Eur J Neurosci. 2009 Nov;30(9):1749-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06967.x. Epub 2009 Oct 26. Eur J Neurosci. 2009. PMID: 19863656 Free PMC article. Review.