Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2005 Winter;17(1):207-30.
doi: 10.1017/s095457940505011x.

Comparable "risks" at the socioeconomic status extremes: preadolescents' perceptions of parenting

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparable "risks" at the socioeconomic status extremes: preadolescents' perceptions of parenting

Suniya S Luthar et al. Dev Psychopathol. 2005 Winter.

Abstract

This study was focused on contextual variations in the parenting dimensions salient for preadolescent adjustment. The sample consisted of 614 sixth graders from two communities, one low and the other high income. Parenting dimensions included those known to be significant in each socioeconomic context: isolation from parents (emotional and physical), and parents' emphasis on achievements (overall expectations and emphasis on integrity over success). Adjustment outcomes included subjective well-being as well as school competence. Contradicting stereotypes, results showed that on average, very affluent children can perceive their parents as emotionally and physically unavailable to the same degree that youth in serious poverty do. The ramifications for adjustment also seem to be largely similar: Closeness to parents was beneficial for all, just as criticism was deleterious. Even after considering the quality of parent-child relationships, parents' physical absence (e.g., at dinner) connoted vulnerability for distress and for poor school performance in both groups. The connotations of a few parenting dimensions varied by context and gender; these variations are discussed as are overall implications for future research and practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Low-income students’ maladjustment outcomes plotted by residual tertiles (for continuous predictors) or dichotomous categories. All outcome scores are expressed in terms of deviations from the mean (zero).
Figure 2
Figure 2
High-income students’ maladjustment outcomes plotted by residual tertiles (for continuous predictors) or dichotomous categories. All outcome scores are expressed in terms of deviations from the mean (zero).

References

    1. Armsden GC, Greenberg MT. The Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment: Individual differences and their relationship to psychological well-being in adolescence. Journal of Youth & Adolescence. 1987;16:427–454. - PubMed
    1. Baumeister RF, Sommer KL. What do men want? Gender differences and two spheres of belongingness: Comment on Cross and Madson (1997) Psychological Bulletin. 1997;122:38–44. - PubMed
    1. Baumrind D. The influence of parenting style on adolescent competence and substance use. Journal of Early Adolescence. 1991;11:56–95.
    1. Belsley DA. Conditioning diagnostics: Collinearity and weak data in regression. New York: Wiley; 1991.
    1. Buss DM. The evolution of happiness. American Psychologist. 2000;55:15–23. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms