Non-invasive assessment of coronary artery stent patency with multislice CT: preliminary experience
- PMID: 15973223
Non-invasive assessment of coronary artery stent patency with multislice CT: preliminary experience
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography (MSCT-CA) in the detection of in-stent restenosis.
Materials and methods: Forty-two patients (33 male, 9 female, mean age 58+/-8 years) previously subjected to percutaneous implantation of coronary stent with suspected in-stent restenosis, underwent a 16-row MSCT (Sensation 16, Siemens) examination. The average time between stent implantation and MSCT-CA was 7.4+/-5.3 months. The following scan parameters were used: collimation 16x0.75 mm, rotation time 0.42 s, feed 3.0 mm/rot., kV 120, mAs 500. After administration of iodinated contrast material (Iomeprol 400 mgI/ml, 100 ml at 4 ml/s) and bolus chaser (40 ml of saline at 4 ml/s) the scan was completed in <20 s. All segments with a stent were assessed by two observers in consensus and were graded according to the following scheme: patent stent, in-stent intimal hyperplasia (IIH) (lumen reduction <50%), in-stent restenosis (ISR) (=/>50%), in-stent occlusion (ISO) (100%). Consensus reading was compared with coronary angiography.
Results: Forty-seven stents were assessed (16 in the right coronary artery; 4 in the left main; 22 in the left anterior descending; 5 in the circumflex). In 7 (17%) stents there was ISR (3) or ISO (4), and in 4 (10%) stents there was IIH. The sensitivity and negative predictive values for the detection of ISO were 80% and 98%, respectively, while for the detection of ISR+ISO they were 50% and 89%, respectively.
Conclusions: Although the results are encouraging, the follow-up of stent patency with MSCT-CA does not show a diagnostic accuracy suitable for clinical implementation.
Similar articles
-
Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice CT in the assessment of coronary stents.Radiol Med. 2007 Jun;112(4):526-37. doi: 10.1007/s11547-007-0159-z. Epub 2007 Jun 11. Radiol Med. 2007. PMID: 17568993 English, Italian.
-
Diagnostic accuracy of 16-row multislice CT angiography in the evaluation of coronary segments.Radiol Med. 2005 Jan-Feb;109(1-2):91-7. Radiol Med. 2005. PMID: 15729189 English, Italian.
-
Noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery stents patency after PTCA: role of Multislice Computed Tomography.Radiol Med. 2004 Jul-Aug;108(1-2):128-37. Radiol Med. 2004. PMID: 15269696 English, Italian.
-
Evaluation of coronary artery in-stent restenosis by 64-section computed tomography: factors affecting assessment and accurate diagnosis.J Thorac Imaging. 2010 Feb;25(1):57-63. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0b013e3181b5d813. J Thorac Imaging. 2010. PMID: 20160604
-
The Value of Multi-slice Computed Tomography Compared to Conventional Coronary Angiography for Detecting In-stent Restenosis.Adv Biomed Res. 2017 Jul 28;6:92. doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.211796. eCollection 2017. Adv Biomed Res. 2017. PMID: 28828343 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Comparison between different kernel reformatting filters in 3D quantitative analysis of MDCT coronary angiography.Radiol Med. 2011 Dec;116(8):1203-16. doi: 10.1007/s11547-011-0719-0. Epub 2011 Sep 2. Radiol Med. 2011. PMID: 21892715 English, Italian.
-
Evaluation of in-stent restenosis in proximal coronary arteries with multidetector computed tomography (MDCT).Eur Radiol. 2007 Jun;17(6):1452-63. doi: 10.1007/s00330-006-0510-0. Epub 2006 Nov 18. Eur Radiol. 2007. PMID: 17115159
-
Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice CT in the assessment of coronary stents.Radiol Med. 2007 Jun;112(4):526-37. doi: 10.1007/s11547-007-0159-z. Epub 2007 Jun 11. Radiol Med. 2007. PMID: 17568993 English, Italian.
-
In vitro evaluation of coronary stents and in-stent stenosis using a dynamic cardiac phantom and a 64-detector row CT scanner.Clin Res Cardiol. 2007 Dec;96(12):883-90. doi: 10.1007/s00392-007-0564-2. Epub 2007 Aug 21. Clin Res Cardiol. 2007. PMID: 17694381
-
Diagnostic accuracy of in-stent coronary restenosis detection with multislice spiral computed tomography: a meta-analysis.Eur Radiol. 2008 Feb;18(2):217-25. doi: 10.1007/s00330-007-0743-6. Epub 2007 Sep 1. Eur Radiol. 2008. PMID: 17763854