Similar articles

• Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation.

  Van Detta JA. Van Detta JA. South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud. 2001 Spring;10(2):211-92. South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud. 2001. PMID: 16485363 No abstract available.
• On the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2000.

  Arkes H. Arkes H. Hum Life Rev. 2000 Fall;26(4):15-26. Hum Life Rev. 2000. PMID: 12530369 No abstract available.
• Infanticide or civil rights for women: did the Supreme Court go too far in Stenberg v. Carhart?

  Schmutz SD. Schmutz SD. Houst Law Rev. 2002 Summer;39(2):529-66. Houst Law Rev. 2002. PMID: 15212035 No abstract available.
• Gestational burdens and fetal status: justifying Roe v. Wade.

  Robertson JA. Robertson JA. Am J Law Med. 1987;13(2-3):189-212. Am J Law Med. 1987. PMID: 3333215 Review. No abstract available.
• Is there life after Roe v. Wade?

  Mahowald MB. Mahowald MB. Hastings Cent Rep. 1989 Jul-Aug;19(4):22-9. Hastings Cent Rep. 1989. PMID: 2663777 Review.