SAFE Homes: is it worth the cost? An evaluation of a group home permanency planning program for children who first enter out-of-home care
- PMID: 15979706
- DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2004.05.007
SAFE Homes: is it worth the cost? An evaluation of a group home permanency planning program for children who first enter out-of-home care
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the SAFE Homes (SH) program, a short-term group care program for children between 3 and 12 years of age who enter care for the first time. The program aims to improve case outcomes by consolidating resources to facilitate assessment and treatment planning.
Methods: The 1-year outcomes of 342 children who received SAFE Home services and 342 matched foster care (FC) control children were compared. The 684 subjects used in this report were selected from a larger pool of 909 subjects using propensity score matching to control for hidden bias in treatment group assignment. We hypothesized that SAFE Homes would result in greater continuity of care for children (e.g., fewer placements, more placements with siblings and in towns of origin), identification of more relatives for substitute care when needed, reduced use of high-cost restrictive care settings (e.g., residential, inpatient), and reduced rates of re-abuse through earlier detection and provision of services to meet child and family treatment needs.
Results: Prior to the initiation of the SAFE Homes program, 75% of the children who entered care in the State experienced three or more placements in the first year. The outcomes of both the SH and FC cases were significantly improved over pre-SAFE Home State statistics. The FC group, however, had comparable or better outcomes on most variables examined. In addition, the total cost for out-of-home care for the children in FC was significantly less, despite the fact that the two groups spent similar amounts of time in care (average time in care: 7 months). This finding held when the total placement cost was calculated using the State reimbursement rate of 206.00 US dollars per day for SAFE Home care (SH: 20,851 US dollars +/- 24,231 US dollars; FC: 8,441 US dollars +/- 21,126 US dollars, p < .001), and a conservative SAFE Home program fee of 85.00 US dollars per day that only considered the child care and custodial staffing costs uniquely associated with the program (SH: 13,314 US dollars +/- 21,718 US dollars; FC: 8,441 US dollars +/-21,126 US dollars, p < .001).
Conclusion: Improvements in outcomes related to continuity of care can be attained through staff training. The SAFE Home model of care is not cost-effective for first-time placements.
Similar articles
-
Hawaii's healthy start home visiting program: determinants and impact of rapid repeat birth.Pediatrics. 2004 Sep;114(3):e317-26. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0618. Pediatrics. 2004. PMID: 15342892 Clinical Trial.
-
Evaluating intensive family preservation programs: a methodological review.Pediatrics. 1996 Apr;97(4):535-42. Pediatrics. 1996. PMID: 8632942
-
Placement changes and emergency department visits in the first year of foster care.Pediatrics. 2004 Sep;114(3):e354-60. doi: 10.1542/peds.2003-0594-F. Pediatrics. 2004. PMID: 15342897
-
Reducing obesity and related chronic disease risk in children and youth: a synthesis of evidence with 'best practice' recommendations.Obes Rev. 2006 Feb;7 Suppl 1:7-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00242.x. Obes Rev. 2006. PMID: 16371076 Review.
-
Evidence-based practice for youth in supervised out-of-home care: a framework for development, definition, and evaluation.J Evid Based Soc Work. 2009 Apr;6(2):147-75. doi: 10.1080/15433710802683796. J Evid Based Soc Work. 2009. PMID: 19431052 Review.
Cited by
-
Untangling the Complexities of Substance Use Initiation and Recovery: Client Reflections on Opioid Use Prevention and Recovery From a Social-Ecological Perspective.Subst Abuse. 2021 Oct 13;15:11782218211050372. doi: 10.1177/11782218211050372. eCollection 2021. Subst Abuse. 2021. PMID: 34675526 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing Outcomes for Youth in Treatment Foster Care and Family-style Group Care.Child Youth Serv Rev. 2008;30(7):746-757. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2007.12.002. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2008. PMID: 19122763 Free PMC article.
-
A multi-method and multi-informant approach to assessing post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in children.Int Rev Psychiatry. 2020 May;32(3):212-220. doi: 10.1080/09540261.2019.1697212. Epub 2019 Dec 27. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2020. PMID: 31880487 Free PMC article.
-
Does Model Matter? Examining Change Across Time for Youth in Group Homes.J Emot Behav Disord. 2017 Jun;25(2):119-128. doi: 10.1177/1063426616630520. Epub 2016 Mar 14. J Emot Behav Disord. 2017. PMID: 28706434 Free PMC article.
-
Social supports and serotonin transporter gene moderate depression in maltreated children.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Dec 7;101(49):17316-21. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0404376101. Epub 2004 Nov 24. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004. PMID: 15563601 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical