Conversion from cyclosporine microemulsion to tacrolimus-based immunoprophylaxis improves cholesterol profile in heart transplant recipients with treated but persistent dyslipidemia: the Canadian multicentre randomized trial of tacrolimus vs cyclosporine microemulsion
- PMID: 15982605
- DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2004.05.023
Conversion from cyclosporine microemulsion to tacrolimus-based immunoprophylaxis improves cholesterol profile in heart transplant recipients with treated but persistent dyslipidemia: the Canadian multicentre randomized trial of tacrolimus vs cyclosporine microemulsion
Abstract
Background: Tacrolimus improves lipid profile in renal and liver transplant recipients. The impact of conversion from cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral) to tacrolimus (Prograf) in a large randomized study of stable heart transplant recipients with treated but persistent mild dyslipidemia is reported.
Methods: One hundred twenty-nine long-term (>or=12 months) cyclosporine microemulsion-treated heart transplant recipients with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol >2.5 mmol/liter and/or a total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio >4 were recruited for the study. Complete lipid profile was assessed before (baseline) and after 6 months of treatment with either cyclosporine microemulsion maintenance (n=64) or tacrolimus conversion (n=65).
Results: At 6 months, tacrolimus-converted patients exhibited a greater decrease in total cholesterol (from 5.51 +/- 0.16 to 4.88 +/- 1.22 mmol/liter [tacrolimus], vs 5.61 +/- 1.36 to 5.38 +/- 0.87 mmol/liter [cyclosporine]; p = 0.0078). This decrease in cholesterol was caused largely by a decrease in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-0.41 +/- 0.54 [tacrolimus] vs -0.13 +/- 0.55 [cyclosporine]; p=0.0018). There were no changes in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride levels, but apolipoprotein B therapy was reduced in tacrolimus-converted vs cyclosporine-maintained patients (p=0.0003). By 6 months, 23.7% of tacrolimus- vs 6.7% of cyclosporine-treated patients met the target lipid levels for high-risk patients (p=0.0094). Conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus resulted in decreases in blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and uric acid without any changes in glucose, HbA(1C), and insulin levels.
Conclusions: Conversion from cyclosporine microemulsion- to tacrolimus-based immunoprophylaxis resulted in decreased cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, urea, creatinine, and uric acid without any clinically evident perturbation of glucose metabolism in stable heart transplant recipients with treated but persistent mild dyslipidemia.
Similar articles
-
Subclinical inflammation and prothrombotic state in heart transplant recipients: impact of cyclosporin microemulsion vs. tacrolimus.Transplantation. 2006 Sep 27;82(6):763-70. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000232286.22319.e0. Transplantation. 2006. PMID: 17006323 Clinical Trial.
-
Conversion to tacrolimus and atorvastatin in cyclosporine-treated heart transplant recipients with dyslipidemia refractory to fluvastatin.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2009 Jun;28(6):598-604. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2009.03.014. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2009. PMID: 19481021
-
Tacrolimus conversion improves hyperlipidemic states in stable liver transplant recipients.Liver Transpl. 2001 Feb;7(2):93-9. doi: 10.1053/jlts.2001.21289. Liver Transpl. 2001. PMID: 11172391
-
Calcineurin inhibitors in heart transplantation.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2004 May;23(5 Suppl):S202-6. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2004.03.008. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2004. PMID: 15093806 Review.
-
Assessing the relative risk of cardiovascular disease among renal transplant patients receiving tacrolimus or cyclosporine.Transpl Int. 2005 Apr;18(4):379-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2005.00080.x. Transpl Int. 2005. PMID: 15773954 Review.
Cited by
-
New and improved strategies for the treatment of gout.Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2010;3:145-66. doi: 10.2147/IJNRD.S6048. Epub 2010 Nov 24. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2010. PMID: 21694941 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term changes in body weight and serum cholesterol in heart transplant recipients.Clin Transplant. 2022 Dec;36(12):e14819. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14819. Epub 2022 Sep 25. Clin Transplant. 2022. PMID: 36074751 Free PMC article.
-
Posttransplant complications: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic interventions.MedComm (2020). 2024 Sep 2;5(9):e669. doi: 10.1002/mco2.669. eCollection 2024 Sep. MedComm (2020). 2024. PMID: 39224537 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The risk of cholelithiasis in patients after heart transplantation.Arch Med Sci. 2014 Feb 24;10(1):53-7. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2014.40733. Epub 2014 Feb 23. Arch Med Sci. 2014. PMID: 24701214 Free PMC article.
-
Tacrolimus: in heart transplant recipients.Drugs. 2006;66(17):2269-79; discussion 2280-2. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200666170-00010. Drugs. 2006. PMID: 17137409 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous