Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Jul;95(7):1149-55.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.042432.

Rural definitions for health policy and research

L Gary Hart  1 , Eric H Larson, Denise M Lishner
Affiliations

Rural definitions for health policy and research

L Gary Hart et al. Am J Public Health. 2005 Jul.

Abstract

The term "rural" suggests many things to many people, such as agricultural landscapes, isolation, small towns, and low population density.However, defining "rural" for health policy and research purposes requires researchers and policy analysts to specify which aspects of rurality are most relevant to the topic at hand and then select an appropriate definition. Rural and urban taxonomies often do not discuss important demographic, cultural, and economic differences across rural places-differences that have major implications for policy and research. Factors such as geographic scale and region also must be considered. Several useful rural taxonomies are discussed and compared in this article. Careful attention to the definition of "rural" is required for effectively targeting policy and research aimed at improving the health of rural Americans.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1—
FIGURE 1—
Comparison of metropolitan and nonmetropolitan classifications with urban and rural classifications, by proportion of 2000 US population (N = 281 421 898): 2000 Census Bureau data. Note. “Metropolitan” and “nonmetropolitan” are Office of Management and Budget terminology; “urban” and “rural” are Census Bureau terminology. an = 202 000 000. bn = 30 000 000. cn = 20 000 000. dn = 29 000 000.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Larson EH, Hart LG. Rural health workforce methods and analysis. In: Larson EH, Johnson KE, Norris TE, et al., eds. State of the Health Workforce in Rural America: State Profiles and Comparisons. Seattle, Wash: WWAMI Rural Health Research Center, University of Washington; 2003:15–22.
    1. Miller MK, Luloff AE. Who is rural? A typological approach to the examination of rurality. Rural Sociol.1981;46:608–625.
    1. Miller KM, Farmer FL, Clarke LL. Rural populations and their health. In: Beaulieu JE, Berry DE, eds. Rural Health Services: A Management Perspective. Ann Arbor, Mich: AUPHA Press/ Health Administration Press; 1994: 3–26.
    1. Council on Graduate Medical Education. Tenth Report: Physician Distribution and Health Care Challenges in Rural and Inner-City Areas. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office; 1998.
    1. Hassenger EW, Hobbs DJ. Rural society—the environment of rural health care. In: Straub LA, Walzer N, eds. Rural Health Care: Innovation in a Changing Environment. Westport, Conn: Praeger; 1992:178–190.