Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2006 Jan;16(1):137-46.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-005-2812-z. Epub 2005 Jun 30.

Low-dose multidetector-row CT angiography of the infra-renal aorta and lower extremity vessels: image quality and diagnostic accuracy in comparison with standard DSA

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Low-dose multidetector-row CT angiography of the infra-renal aorta and lower extremity vessels: image quality and diagnostic accuracy in comparison with standard DSA

Francesco Fraioli et al. Eur Radiol. 2006 Jan.

Abstract

To investigate the possibility of reducing X-ray exposure during multidetector-row spiral computed tomographic (MDCT) angiography and to compare the image quality and diagnostic accuracy of different dosages with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in the evaluation of the infra-renal aorta and lower extremities vessels. Seventy-five patients, randomly divided into three groups of 25 patients each, were evaluated for atherosclerotic disease with four-row spiral CT angiography (4x2.5 mm) and DSA. MDCT scanning parameters were kept constant, except for milliamperage (mAs): group A: 50 mAs; group B: 100 mAs; group C: 130 mAs. Images were analysed by two vascular radiologists in consensus. DSA represented the standard of reference. The diagnostic value of MDCT and total radiation exposure were evaluated for each data set. The simulated effective dose was 3.7 mSv for 50 mAs, 8.2 mSv for 100 mAs and 13.7 mSv for 130 mAs for men, and 4 mSv for 50 mAs, 8.9 mSv for 100 mAs and 14.8 mSv for 130 mAs for women. The dose reduction was 74% for group A and 40% for group B. The evaluation of the presence and degree of stenoses revealed a sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV of 96%, 94%, 95%, 83% and 99% for Group A (50 mAs), 96%, 96%, 96%, 89% and 99% for Group B (100 mAs) and 98%, 96%, 97%, 91% and 100% for the standard dose protocol, Group C (130 mAs). Low-dose scanning is thus a feasible and accurate option for four-row CT angiography of the peripheral vessels. This technique provides substantial reduction of the radiation dose delivered to the patient while maintaining optimal diagnostic accuracy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Eur Radiol. 2004 Apr;14 (4):691-702 - PubMed
    1. Br J Radiol. 1998 Jul;71(847):734-44 - PubMed
    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001 Dec;177(6):1273-5 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 2000 Nov;217(2):430-5 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Radiol. 2003 Mar;45 Suppl 1:S88-93 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources