The relationship between maximal urethral closure pressure and functional urethral length in anterior vaginal wall prolapse patients according to stage and age
- PMID: 15988814
- PMCID: PMC2815819
- DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2005.46.3.408
The relationship between maximal urethral closure pressure and functional urethral length in anterior vaginal wall prolapse patients according to stage and age
Abstract
MUCP (Maximal urethral closure pressure) is known to be increased in patients with vaginal wall prolapse due to the mechanical obstruction of the urethra. However, urethral function following reduction has not yet been completely elucidated. Predicting postoperative urethral function may provide patients with important, additional information prior to surgery. Thus, this study was performed to evaluate the relationship between MUCP and functional urethral length (FUL) according to stage and age in anterior vaginal wall prolapse patients. 139 patients diagnosed with anterior vaginal wall prolapse at Yonsei University Medical College (YUMC) from March 1999 to May 2003 who had underwent urethral pressure profilometry following reduction were included in this study. The stage of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) was determined according to the dependent portion of the anterior vaginal wall (Aa, Ba). (By International Continence Society's POP Quantification system) Patients were divided into one of four age groups: patients in their 40s (n = 13), 50s (n = 53), 60s (n = 54), and 70 and over (n = 16). No difference in MUCP was found between the age groups. The FUL of patients in their 40s was shorter than that of patient's in their 50s and 60s. Patients were also divided into stages: stage II (n = 35), stage III (n = 76), and stage IV (n = 25). No significant difference in MUCP was found according to stage and FUL. However, a significant difference was noted between stage III and IV as stage IV was longer. Anterior vaginal wall prolapse is known to affect urethral function due to prolapse itself, but according to our study, prolapse itself did not alter urethral function. This suggests that, regardless of age and stage, prolapse corrective surgery does not affect the urethral function.
Figures
References
-
- Thompson JD. Surgical correction of defects in pelvic support. In: Thompson JD, Rock JA, editors. The Linde's operative gynecology. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publisher; 1997. p. 963.
-
- Luber KM, Boero S, Choe JY. The demographics of pelvic floor disorders: current observations and future projections. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184:1496–1501. - PubMed
-
- Stanton SL, Mattiasson A, Hilton P. Voiding difficulty in the female prevalence, clinical and urodynamic review. Obstet Gynecol. 1983;61:144–147. - PubMed
-
- Richardson DA, Bent AE, Ostergard DR. The effect of uterovaginal prolapse on urethrovesical pressure dynamics. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983;146:901–905. - PubMed
-
- Bump RC, Fantl A, Hurt G. The mechanism of urinary incontinence in women with sever uterovaginal prolapse: Results of barrier studies. Obstet Gynecol. 1988;72:291–295. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical