Cancer patients' self-reported attitudes about the Internet
- PMID: 15998613
- PMCID: PMC1550663
- DOI: 10.2196/jmir.7.3.e22
Cancer patients' self-reported attitudes about the Internet
Abstract
Background: Increasing numbers of cancer patients are using the Internet, but little is known about their attitudes toward online health care.
Objective: The purpose of this substudy was to analyze cancer patients' attitudes toward online health care.
Methods: This was a substudy of 41 persons with cancer who used the Internet for health care information and support and who completed the Attitudes Toward Online Health Care (ATOHC) survey.
Results: The majority of study participants were married, held graduate degrees, and had high incomes. Using a five-point Likert scale, means for the five dimensions of the ATOHC survey were as follows: community and news 3.22 (SD = 1.01), outcomes 3.20 (SD = 1.08), trusted information and advice 2.73 (SD = 0.66), self-efficacy in evaluating information and intention 3.46 (SD = 0.65), and disclosure 3.15 (SD = 1.06). The average response fell between "About half the time" and "Usually." Favorite websites for content were Medscape and WebMD, while favorite sites for support were WebMD and Mediconsult.
Conclusions: Respondents were generally eager to obtain and offer cancer information and support online, but they were skeptical of unknown sources. They were comfortable both giving and receiving information and support. Respondents were interested in the experiences of other patients and benefited by their direct and indirect interactions with them. Respondents felt that they coped better with their illness and experienced less uncertainty and anxiety as a result of their online experiences. They reported a certain level of trust, primarily for established reputable sources of information, and they were confident in their ability to evaluate the information, including research reports. In addition, cancer patients displayed a healthy skepticism when presented with the option of divulging their personal health information; however, they were willing to provide personal details if, as a result, a website provided them with individualized information.
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
References
-
- Fox S, Fallows D. Internet health resources: health services and email have become more commonplace, but there is room for improvement in searches and overall Internet access. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2003. Jul 16,
-
- Jemal Ahmedin, Murray Taylor, Ward Elizabeth, Samuels Alicia, Tiwari Ram C, Ghafoor Asma, Feuer Eric J, Thun Michael J. Cancer statistics, 2005. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005 Jan-Feb;55(1):10–30. http://caonline.amcancersoc.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=15661684. - PubMed
-
- Rowland J, Mariotto A, Aziz N, et al. Cancer Survivorship-United States, 1971-2001. [2004 Aug 19];MMWR. 2004 Jun 25;53:526–529. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5324a3.htm.
-
- McCorkle Ruth, Pasacreta Jeannie, Tang Siew Tzuh. The silent killer: psychological issues in ovarian cancer. Holist Nurs Pract. 2003 Nov;17(6):300–8. - PubMed
-
- Eysenbach Gunther. The impact of the Internet on cancer outcomes. CA Cancer J Clin. 2003;53(6):356–71. http://caonline.amcancersoc.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=15224975. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
