Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Sep;48(9):1833-40.
doi: 10.1007/s00125-005-1852-x. Epub 2005 Jul 7.

Interstitial fluid glucose dynamics during insulin-induced hypoglycaemia

Affiliations

Interstitial fluid glucose dynamics during insulin-induced hypoglycaemia

G M Steil et al. Diabetologia. 2005 Sep.

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis: Glucose sensors often measure s.c. interstitial fluid (ISF) glucose rather than blood or plasma glucose. Putative differences between plasma and ISF glucose include a protracted delay during the recovery from hypoglycaemia and an increased gradient during hyperinsulinaemia. These have often been investigated using sensor systems that have delays due to signal smoothing, or require long equilibration times. The aim of the present study was to define these relationships during hypoglycaemia in a well-equilibrated system with no smoothing.

Methods: Hypoglycaemia was induced by i.v. insulin infusion (360 pmol.m(-2).min(-1)) in ten non-diabetic subjects. Glucose was sequentially clamped at approximately 5, 4.2 and 3.1 mmol/l and allowed to return to normoglycaemia. Subjects wore two s.c. glucose sensors (Medtronic MiniMed, Northridge, CA, USA) that had been inserted for more than 12 h. A two-compartment model was used to quantify the delay and gradient.

Results: The delay during the fall in plasma glucose was not different from the delay during recovery (8.3+/-0.67 vs 6.3+/-1.1 min; p=0.27) and no differences were observed in the ratio of sensor current to plasma glucose at basal insulin (2.7+/-0.25 nA.mmol(-1).l) compared with any of the hyperinsulinaemic clamp phases (2.8+/-0.18, 2.7+/-0.021, 2.9+/-0.21; p=NS). The ratio was significantly elevated following recovery to normoglycaemia (3.1+/-0.2 nA.mmol(-1).l; p<0.001).

Conclusions/interpretation: The elevated ratio suggests that the plasma to ISF glucose gradient was decreased following hypoglycaemia, possibly due to increased skin blood flow. Recovery from hypoglycaemia is not accompanied by a protracted delay and insulin does not increase the plasma to s.c. ISF glucose gradient.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Am J Physiol. 1994 Aug;267(2 Pt 1):E187-202 - PubMed
    1. Diabetologia. 1997 Nov;40(11):1320-6 - PubMed
    1. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2002;4(5):607-13 - PubMed
    1. Horm Metab Res. 1997 Sep;29(9):440-3 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002 Aug;87(8):3902-10 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources