Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2005 Jul;86(7):1287-92.
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.01.004.

Medicare funding for inpatient rehabilitation: How did we get to this point and what do we do now?

Affiliations
Review

Medicare funding for inpatient rehabilitation: How did we get to this point and what do we do now?

Randall L Braddom. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Jul.

Abstract

This edited transcript of the 2004 Zeiter Lecture is intended to underscore the current plight of inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) and the attempt to deliver services to patients while coping with the limitations of the federal "75% rule." The history of federal funding for inpatient rehabilitation is traced from the first attempt to nationalize health insurance in 1916 to the funding status at the time of the lecture in October 2004. Important events along the way are highlighted, including the signing of the Medicare Act in 1965, permitting those on Social Security disability income to be eligible for Medicare after being disabled for 24 months (1972); onset of the hospital inpatient prospective payment system and IRF exemption in 1982; advent of the original 75% rule in 1983; impact of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997; and negative impact of the final 75% rule of 2004. The critical need for members of the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and their patients to be involved in eliminating or changing the 75% rule is stressed in a "call to action."

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources