Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy for infections with methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus
- PMID: 16004164
- DOI: 10.1097/01.SMJ.0000145300.28736.BB
Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy for infections with methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus
Abstract
Objectives: As increasing numbers of patients are being treated with outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT), it becomes ever more important to ascertain the risks and benefits of such treatment for patients.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 1,515 patients with methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus infections who were treated with outpatient parenteral antimicrobial monotherapy. All patients were included in the adverse drug reaction analysis; 1,252 were evaluable for purposes of evaluating treatment efficacy.
Results: The six antibiotics most frequently used in this study (ceftriaxone, cefazolin, vancomycin, oxacillin, nafcillin, and clindamycin) appeared to be equivalent in achieving the desired efficacy outcome.
Conclusions: Vancomycin was associated with a significantly greater number of side effects than was ceftriaxone, cefazolin, or oxacillin, and nafcillin was associated with a significantly greater number of adverse events than ceftriaxone.
Comment in
-
Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy: not so crazy after all these years.South Med J. 2005 Jun;98(6):587. doi: 10.1097/01.SMJ.0000167698.49249.E6. South Med J. 2005. PMID: 16004162 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials