Can hormesis be a default for dose-response?
- PMID: 16004192
- DOI: 10.1191/0960327105ht524oa
Can hormesis be a default for dose-response?
Abstract
Since the 1920s, interest in hormesis has peaked and ebbed. Hormesis had been a forgotten theory until recent investigation by Dr Ed Calabrese at the University of Massachusetts, along with others, resurrected it from obscurity. This renewed interest is demonstrated by recent articles in prestigious scientific journals such as Nature and Science as well as the popular press (Discovery, US News and World Report and newspapers such as the Boston Globe). Currently, a strong interest in this theory of dose-response (which predicts contrasting effects at low versus high doses) exists and is explored in this issue.
Comment on
-
How much is enough to accept hormesis as the default? or 'At what point, if ever, could/should hormesis be employed as the principal dose-response default assumption in risk assessment?'.Hum Exp Toxicol. 2005 May;24(5):245-7. doi: 10.1191/0960327105ht519oa. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2005. PMID: 16004187
-
A critique of the use of hormesis in risk assessment.Hum Exp Toxicol. 2005 May;24(5):249-53. doi: 10.1191/0960327105ht520oa. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2005. PMID: 16004188
-
Hormesis and risk assessment.Hum Exp Toxicol. 2005 May;24(5):255-7. doi: 10.1191/0960327105ht522oa. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2005. PMID: 16004189
-
Examining the risks and benefits of replacing traditional dose-response with hormesis.Hum Exp Toxicol. 2005 May;24(5):259-64. doi: 10.1191/0960327105ht521oa. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2005. PMID: 16004190
-
Hormesis: how it could affect the risk assessment process.Hum Exp Toxicol. 2005 May;24(5):265-70. doi: 10.1191/0960327105ht523oa. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2005. PMID: 16004191
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
