Prenatal detection of Down's syndrome by rapid aneuploidy testing for chromosomes 13, 18, and 21 by FISH or PCR without a full karyotype: a cytogenetic risk assessment
- PMID: 16005334
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66790-6
Prenatal detection of Down's syndrome by rapid aneuploidy testing for chromosomes 13, 18, and 21 by FISH or PCR without a full karyotype: a cytogenetic risk assessment
Abstract
Background: In 2004, the UK National Screening Committee (UKNSC) recommended that new screening programmes for Down's syndrome need not include karyotyping and can offer prenatal diagnosis for the syndrome with FISH (fluorescence in-situ hybridisation) or PCR as rapid diagnostic tests. The UKNSC also recommended that FISH or PCR tests should only include trisomies 13, 18, and 21. We undertook a retrospective cytogenetic audit to assess the probable clinical effect of these proposed policy changes.
Methods: 23 prenatal cytogenetic laboratories from the UK public sector submitted data for amniotic fluid or chorionic villus samples referred from April, 1999, to March, 2004. We obtained data for the details of all abnormal karyotypes by reason for referral and assessed the efficiency of FISH and PCR rapid tests for the detection of chromosome abnormalities.
Findings: Of 119,528 amniotic fluid and 23,077 chorionic villus samples, rapid aneuploidy testing replacement of karyotyping would have resulted in about one in 100 and one in 40 samples having an undetected abnormal karyotype, respectively. Of these missed results, 293 (30%) of 1006 amniotic fluid samples and 152 (45%) of 327 chorionic villus samples were associated with a substantial risk of an abnormal phenotypic outcome. Of 34,995 amniotic fluid and 3049 chorionic villus samples that had karyotyping and a rapid test on the same sample, none of the three technologies was completely reliable to detect an abnormal karyotype, but the best protocol for an interpretable result was PCR and karyotyping or FISH and karyotyping.
Interpretation: Replacement of full karyotyping with rapid testing for trisomies 13, 18, and 21 after a positive screen for Down's syndrome will result in substantial numbers of liveborn children with hitherto preventable mental or physical handicaps, and represents a substantial change in the outcome quality of prenatal testing offered to couples in the UK.
Comment in
-
Rapid aneuploidy testing, traditional karyotyping, or both?Lancet. 2005 Jul 9-15;366(9480):97-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66791-8. Lancet. 2005. PMID: 16005312 No abstract available.
-
Prenatal diagnosis.Lancet. 2005 Oct 1;366(9492):1159-60; author reply 1160-1. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67471-5. Lancet. 2005. PMID: 16198756 No abstract available.
-
Prenatal diagnosis.Lancet. 2005 Oct 1;366(9492):1161-2. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67473-9. Lancet. 2005. PMID: 16198759 No abstract available.
-
Prenatal diagnosis.Lancet. 2005 Oct 1;366(9492):1162. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67474-0. Lancet. 2005. PMID: 16198761 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Detection of mosaicism for primary trisomies in prenatal samples by QF-PCR and karyotype analysis.Prenat Diagn. 2005 Jan;25(1):65-72. doi: 10.1002/pd.1086. Prenat Diagn. 2005. PMID: 15662691
-
The future of prenatal diagnosis: rapid testing or full karyotype? An audit of chromosome abnormalities and pregnancy outcomes for women referred for Down's Syndrome testing.BJOG. 2005 Oct;112(10):1369-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00695.x. BJOG. 2005. PMID: 16167939
-
Prenatal diagnosis by rapid aneuploidy detection and karyotyping: a prospective study of the role of ultrasound in 1589 second-trimester amniocenteses.Prenat Diagn. 2004 Oct;24(10):790-5. doi: 10.1002/pd.985. Prenat Diagn. 2004. PMID: 15503279
-
Use of a DNA method, QF-PCR, in the prenatal diagnosis of fetal aneuploidies.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011 Sep;33(9):955-960. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)35022-8. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011. PMID: 21923994 Review.
-
[Future of prenatal cytogenetic studies: rapid aneuploidy testing or full karyotype].Ginekol Pol. 2007 Nov;78(11):881-7. Ginekol Pol. 2007. PMID: 18306922 Review. Polish.
Cited by
-
Advances in prenatal screening: the ethical dimension.Nat Rev Genet. 2011 Aug 18;12(9):657-63. doi: 10.1038/nrg3036. Nat Rev Genet. 2011. PMID: 21850045 Review.
-
Nucleic Acids Analysis.Sci China Chem. 2021;64(2):171-203. doi: 10.1007/s11426-020-9864-7. Epub 2020 Dec 2. Sci China Chem. 2021. PMID: 33293939 Free PMC article. Review.
-
CRISPR/Cas-Based Prenatal Screening for Aneuploidy: Challenges and Opportunities for Early Diagnosis.Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Mar 27;61(4):610. doi: 10.3390/medicina61040610. Medicina (Kaunas). 2025. PMID: 40282900 Free PMC article. Review.
-
BACs-on-Beads technology: a reliable test for rapid detection of aneuploidies and microdeletions in prenatal diagnosis.Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:590298. doi: 10.1155/2014/590298. Epub 2014 Mar 27. Biomed Res Int. 2014. PMID: 24795887 Free PMC article.
-
Recent advances in prenatal genetic screening and testing.F1000Res. 2016 Oct 28;5:2591. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.9215.1. eCollection 2016. F1000Res. 2016. PMID: 27853526 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous