A Bayesian approach to jointly modeling toxicity and biomarker expression in a phase I/II dose-finding trial
- PMID: 16011680
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00314.x
A Bayesian approach to jointly modeling toxicity and biomarker expression in a phase I/II dose-finding trial
Abstract
In this article, we propose a Bayesian approach to phase I/II dose-finding oncology trials by jointly modeling a binary toxicity outcome and a continuous biomarker expression outcome. We apply our method to a clinical trial of a new gene therapy for bladder cancer patients. In this trial, the biomarker expression indicates biological activity of the new therapy. For ethical reasons, the trial is conducted sequentially, with the dose for each successive patient chosen using both toxicity and activity data from patients previously treated in the trial. The modeling framework that we use naturally incorporates correlation between the binary toxicity and continuous activity outcome via a latent Gaussian variable. The dose-escalation/de-escalation decision rules are based on the posterior distributions of both toxicity and activity. A flexible state-space model is used to relate the activity outcome and dose. Extensive simulation studies show that the design reliably chooses the preferred dose using both toxicity and expression outcomes under various clinical scenarios.
Similar articles
-
Continuous toxicity monitoring in phase II trials in oncology.Biometrics. 2005 Jun;61(2):540-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00311.x. Biometrics. 2005. PMID: 16011702
-
Bayesian dose-finding in phase I/II clinical trials using toxicity and efficacy odds ratios.Biometrics. 2006 Sep;62(3):777-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00534.x. Biometrics. 2006. PMID: 16984320
-
Dose-finding in phase I clinical trials based on toxicity probability intervals.Clin Trials. 2007;4(3):235-44. doi: 10.1177/1740774507079442. Clin Trials. 2007. PMID: 17715248
-
Statistical designs for early phases of cancer clinical trials.J Biopharm Stat. 2012;22(6):1109-26. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2011.571801. J Biopharm Stat. 2012. PMID: 23075011 Review.
-
Bayesian sample size calculations in phase II clinical trials using informative conjugate priors.Control Clin Trials. 2004 Apr;25(2):157-67. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2003.11.006. Control Clin Trials. 2004. PMID: 15020034 Review.
Cited by
-
An adaptive multi-stage phase I dose-finding design incorporating continuous efficacy and toxicity data from multiple treatment cycles.J Biopharm Stat. 2019;29(2):271-286. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2018.1535497. Epub 2018 Nov 7. J Biopharm Stat. 2019. PMID: 30403559 Free PMC article.
-
Innovative Clinical Trial Designs: Toward a 21st-Century Health Care System.Stat Biosci. 2011 Dec;3(2):145-168. doi: 10.1007/s12561-011-9042-5. Stat Biosci. 2011. PMID: 26140056 Free PMC article.
-
A phase I/II seamless dose escalation/expansion with adaptive randomization scheme (SEARS).Clin Trials. 2014 Feb;11(1):49-59. doi: 10.1177/1740774513500081. Epub 2013 Oct 17. Clin Trials. 2014. PMID: 24137041 Free PMC article.
-
Parametric Dose Standardization for Optimizing Two-Agent Combinations in a Phase I-II Trial with Ordinal Outcomes.J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat. 2017 Jan;66(1):201-224. doi: 10.1111/rssc.12162. Epub 2016 Jun 11. J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat. 2017. PMID: 28255183 Free PMC article.
-
A flexible design for advanced Phase I/II clinical trials with continuous efficacy endpoints.Biom J. 2019 Nov;61(6):1477-1492. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201800313. Epub 2019 Jul 12. Biom J. 2019. PMID: 31298770 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical