Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Jul 13:5:50.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-5-50.

What do we know about how to do audit and feedback? Pitfalls in applying evidence from a systematic review

R Foy  1 , M P Eccles, G Jamtvedt, J Young, J M Grimshaw, R Baker
Affiliations

What do we know about how to do audit and feedback? Pitfalls in applying evidence from a systematic review

R Foy et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Improving the quality of health care requires a range of evidence-based activities. Audit and feedback is commonly used as a quality improvement tool in the UK National Health Service [NHS]. We set out to assess whether current guidance and systematic review evidence can sufficiently inform practical decisions about how to use audit and feedback to improve quality of care.

Methods: We selected an important chronic disease encountered in primary care: diabetes mellitus. We identified recommendations from National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidance on conducting audit and generated questions which would be relevant to any attempt to operationalise audit and feedback in a healthcare service setting. We explored the extent to which a systematic review of audit and feedback could provide practical guidance about whether audit and feedback should be used to improve quality of diabetes care and, if so, how audit and feedback could be optimised.

Results: National guidance suggests the importance of securing the right organisational conditions and processes. Review evidence suggests that audit and feedback can be effective in changing healthcare professional practice. However, the available evidence says relatively little about the detail of how to use audit and feedback most efficiently.

Conclusion: Audit and feedback will continue to be an unreliable approach to quality improvement until we learn how and when it works best. Conceptualising audit and feedback within a theoretical framework offers a way forward.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MacLennan G, Fraser C, Ramsay CR, Vale L, Whitty P, Eccles MP, Matowe L, Shirran L, Wensing M, Dijkstra R, Donaldson C. Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess. 2004;8:1–72. - PubMed
    1. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination . Effective Health Care. University of York; 1999. Getting evidence into practice.
    1. Crossing the quality chasm: the IOM Health Care Quality Initiative. Institute of Medicine. 2001.
    1. National Institute for Clinical Excellence . Principles for Best Practice in Clinical Audit. Abingdon: Radcliffe Medical Press; 2002.
    1. Jamtvedt G, Young JM, Kristoffersen DT, O'Brien MA, Oxman AD. The Cochrane Library. Oxford: Update Software; 2004. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. - PubMed