Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Aug 20;331(7514):428.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.38537.397512.55. Epub 2005 Jul 12.

Role of mobile phones in motor vehicle crashes resulting in hospital attendance: a case-crossover study

Suzanne P McEvoy  1 , Mark R Stevenson, Anne T McCartt, Mark Woodward, Claire Haworth, Peter Palamara, Rina Cercarelli
Affiliations

Role of mobile phones in motor vehicle crashes resulting in hospital attendance: a case-crossover study

Suzanne P McEvoy et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objectives: To explore the effect of drivers' use of mobile (cell) phones on road safety.

Design: A case-crossover study.

Setting: Perth, Western Australia.

Participants: 456 drivers aged > or = 17 years who owned or used mobile phones and had been involved in road crashes necessitating hospital attendance between April 2002 and July 2004.

Main outcome measure: Driver's use of mobile phone at estimated time of crash and on trips at the same time of day in the week before the crash. Interviews with drivers in hospital and phone company's records of phone use.

Results: Driver's use of a mobile phone up to 10 minutes before a crash was associated with a fourfold increased likelihood of crashing (odds ratio 4.1, 95% confidence interval 2.2 to 7.7, P < 0.001). Risk was raised irrespective of whether or not a hands-free device was used (hands-free: 3.8, 1.8 to 8.0, P < 0.001; hand held: 4.9, 1.6 to 15.5, P = 0.003). Increased risk was similar in men and women and in drivers aged > or = 30 and < 30 years. A third (n = 21) of calls before crashes and on trips during the previous week were reportedly on hand held phones.

Conclusions: When drivers use a mobile phone there is an increased likelihood of a crash resulting in injury. Using a hands-free phone is not any safer.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Glassbrenner D. Driver cell phone use in 2004, overall results. Washington, DC: US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2005. (DOT HS-809-847.)
    1. Horberry T, Bubnich C, Hartleyk L, Lamble D. Drivers' use of hand-held mobile phones in Western Australia. Transportation Research Part F 2001;4: 213-8.
    1. Johal S, Napier F, Britt-Compton J, Marshall T. Mobile phones and driving. J Public Health Oxf 2005;27: 112-3. - PubMed
    1. Taylor DMcD, Bennett DM, Carter M, Garewal D. Mobile telephone use among Melbourne drivers: a preventable exposure to injury risk. Med J Aust 2003;179: 140-2. - PubMed
    1. Royal D. National survey of distracted and drowsy driving attitudes and behaviour: 2002. Vol 1. Findings. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2003. (DOT HS-809-566.)

Publication types