A randomized trial comparing low-dose combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and conventional epidural anesthesia for cesarean section in severe preeclampsia
- PMID: 16013660
A randomized trial comparing low-dose combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and conventional epidural anesthesia for cesarean section in severe preeclampsia
Abstract
Background and objectives: A prospective, randomized study was designed to compare the maternal and neonatal effects of conventional epidural anesthesia and combined spinal epidural anesthesia (CSE) for Cesarean section in severe preeclamptic patients. Additionally, two strategies in the prophylactic management of hypotension in severe preeclamptic patients were evaluated: fluid preloading or prophylactic ephedrine.
Methods: Thirty nonlaboring women with severe preeclampsia (PET), scheduled for an elective Cesarean section, were randomised into three groups: epidural anesthesia with prophylactic fluid loading (EA-F), combined spinal epidural anesthesia with prophylactic fluid loading (CSE-F), or combined spinal epidural anesthesia with prophylactic ephedrine (CSE-V). Hemodynamic data were recorded prior and after induction of regional anesthesia at five-minute intervals. The total amount of intravenous administered fluid and the total dose of vasopressors were recorded.
Results: Hemodynamic data were similar between the three groups. The incidence and duration of hypotension was similar in all three groups. Significantly more ephedrine was used in the CSE-V group as compared to the CSE-F group. More lactated Ringer's solution was used in the CSE-F group as compared to the CSE-V group. There were no hypertensive episodes and none of the patients developed pulmonary edema. The time period from induction until the start of surgery and the duration of surgery were significantly shorter in both CSE-groups. Neonatal outcome was comparable between the three groups.
Conclusion: Our results confirm that combined spinal and epidural anesthesia (CSE) is a safe alternative to conventional epidural anesthesia in severe preeclamptic women and that the prophylactic use of ephedrine is effective and safe to prevent and treat spinal hypotension after combined spinal and epidural anesthesia for Cesarean section in severe preeclamptic women.
Similar articles
-
Fetal effects of prophylactic ephedrine and maternal hypotension during regional anesthesia for cesarean section.J Matern Fetal Med. 1996 Mar-Apr;5(2):79-84. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6661(199603/04)5:2<79::AID-MFM6>3.0.CO;2-N. J Matern Fetal Med. 1996. PMID: 8796773 Clinical Trial.
-
Hydroxyethylstarch 10% is superior to Ringer's solution for preloading before spinal anesthesia for Cesarean section.Can J Anaesth. 2000 Jul;47(7):616-21. doi: 10.1007/BF03018992. Can J Anaesth. 2000. PMID: 10930199 Clinical Trial.
-
Low-dose combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery: a comparison of three plain local anesthetics.Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2006;57(1):39-43. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2006. PMID: 16617756 Clinical Trial.
-
A review of the impact of phenylephrine administration on maternal hemodynamics and maternal and neonatal outcomes in women undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia.Anesth Analg. 2012 Feb;114(2):377-90. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182373a3e. Epub 2011 Nov 21. Anesth Analg. 2012. PMID: 22104076 Review.
-
Prophylactic ephedrine prevents hypotension during spinal anesthesia for Cesarean delivery but does not improve neonatal outcome: a quantitative systematic review.Can J Anaesth. 2002 Jun-Jul;49(6):588-99. doi: 10.1007/BF03017387. Can J Anaesth. 2002. PMID: 12067872
Cited by
-
[Recent standards in management of obstetric anesthesia].Wien Med Wochenschr. 2017 Nov;167(15-16):374-389. doi: 10.1007/s10354-017-0584-0. Epub 2017 Jul 25. Wien Med Wochenschr. 2017. PMID: 28744777 Review. German.
-
Subarachnoid block for caesarean section in severe preeclampsia.J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Apr;27(2):169-73. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.81821. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2011. PMID: 21772674 Free PMC article.
-
Regional anesthesia in patients with pregnancy induced hypertension.J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Oct;29(4):435-44. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.119108. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2013. PMID: 24249977 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparing the Hemodynamic Effects of Spinal Anesthesia in Preeclamptic and Healthy Parturients During Cesarean Section.Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Jun 5;6(3):e11519. doi: 10.5812/aapm.11519. eCollection 2016 Jun. Anesth Pain Med. 2016. PMID: 27642568 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical