Primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction: time, time, and time!
- PMID: 16020578
- PMCID: PMC1769058
- DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2004.050625
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction: time, time, and time!
Abstract
Longer door-to-balloon times, total duration of ischaemia, and time of presentation relative to symptom onset all have an impact on outcome following primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
References
-
- Keeley E, Boura J, Grines C. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet 2003;361:13–20. - PubMed
-
- Berger PB, Ellis SG, Holmes DR Jr, et al. Relationship between delay in performing direct coronary angioplasty and early clinical outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from the global use of strategies to open occluded arteries in acute coronary syndromes (GUSTO-IIb) trial. Circulation 1999;100 (1) :14–20. - PubMed
-
- Cannon CP, Gibson CM, Lambrew CT, et al. Relationship of symptom-onset-to-balloon time and door-to-balloon time with mortality in patients undergoing angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. JAMA 2000;283:2941–7. - PubMed
-
- Juliard JM, Feldman LJ, Golmard JL, et al. Relation of mortality of primary angioplasty during acute myocardial infarction to door-to-thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) time. Am J Cardiol 2003;91:1401–5. - PubMed
-
- Boersma E, Maas AC, Deckers JW, et al. Early thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction: reappraisal of the golden hour. Lancet 1996;348:771–5. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical