Engineering craniofacial scaffolds
- PMID: 16022718
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2005.00329.x
Engineering craniofacial scaffolds
Abstract
Objective: To develop an integrated approach for engineering craniofacial scaffolds and to demonstrate that these engineered scaffolds would have mechanical properties in the range of craniofacial tissue and support bone regeneration for craniofacial reconstruction.
Experimental variable: Scaffold architecture designed to achieve desired elasticity and permeability. Scaffold external shape designed to match craniofacial anatomy.
Outcome measure: Final fabricated biomaterial scaffolds. Compressive mechanical modulus and strength. Bone regeneration as measured by micro-CT scanning, mechanical testing and histology.
Setting: Departments of Biomedical Engineering, Oral/Maxillofacial Surgery, and Oral Medicine, Pathology and Oncology at the University of Michigan.
Results: Results showed that the design/fabrication approach could create scaffolds with designed porous architecture to match craniofacial anatomy. These scaffolds could be fabricated from a wide range of biomaterials, including titanium, degradable polymers, and degradable calcium phosphate ceramics. Mechanical tests showed that fabricated scaffolds had compressive modulus ranging 50 to 2900 MPa and compressive strength ranging from 2 to over 56 MPa, within the range of human craniofacial trabecular bone. In vivo testing of designed scaffolds showed that they could support bone regeneration via delivery of BMP-7 transduced human gingival fibroblasts in a mouse model. Designed hydroxyapatite scaffolds with pore diameters ranging from 400 to 1200 microns were implanted in minipig mandibular defects for 6 and 18 weeks. Results showed substantial bone ingrowth (between 40 and 50% at 6 weeks, between 70 and 80% at 18 weeks) for all scaffolds, with no significant difference based on pore diameter.
Conclusion: Integrated image-based design and solid free-form fabrication can create scaffolds that attain desired elasticity and permeability while fitting any 3D craniofacial defect. The scaffolds could be manufactured from degradable polymers, calcium phosphate ceramics and titanium. The designed scaffolds supported significant bone regeneration for all pore sizes ranging from 300 to 1200 microns. These results suggest that designed scaffolds are clinically applicable for complex craniofacial reconstruction.
Similar articles
-
Bone tissue engineering using polycaprolactone scaffolds fabricated via selective laser sintering.Biomaterials. 2005 Aug;26(23):4817-27. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.057. Epub 2005 Jan 23. Biomaterials. 2005. PMID: 15763261
-
Preparation and characterization of a multilayer biomimetic scaffold for bone tissue engineering.J Biomater Appl. 2007 Nov;22(3):223-39. doi: 10.1177/0885328206073706. Epub 2007 Jan 25. J Biomater Appl. 2007. PMID: 17255157
-
Bilayer hydroxyapatite scaffolds for maxillofacial bone tissue engineering.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Mar-Apr;27(2):288-94. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012. PMID: 22442766
-
Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis.Biomaterials. 2005 Sep;26(27):5474-91. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002. Biomaterials. 2005. PMID: 15860204 Review.
-
The engineering of craniofacial tissues in the laboratory: a review of biomaterials for scaffolds and implant coatings.Dent Clin North Am. 2006 Apr;50(2):205-16, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2005.11.006. Dent Clin North Am. 2006. PMID: 16530058 Review.
Cited by
-
Height-to-Diameter Ratio and Porosity Strongly Influence Bulk Compressive Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed Polymer Scaffolds.Polymers (Basel). 2022 Nov 18;14(22):5017. doi: 10.3390/polym14225017. Polymers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36433144 Free PMC article.
-
Multidimensional 3D-Printed Scaffolds and Regeneration of Intrabony Periodontal Defects: A Systematic Review.J Funct Biomater. 2024 Feb 15;15(2):44. doi: 10.3390/jfb15020044. J Funct Biomater. 2024. PMID: 38391897 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Challenges on optimization of 3D-printed bone scaffolds.Biomed Eng Online. 2020 Sep 3;19(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12938-020-00810-2. Biomed Eng Online. 2020. PMID: 32883300 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Regenerative medicine as applied to general surgery.Ann Surg. 2012 May;255(5):867-80. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318243a4db. Ann Surg. 2012. PMID: 22330032 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Facial Bone Reconstruction Using both Marine or Non-Marine Bone Substitutes: Evaluation of Current Outcomes in a Systematic Literature Review.Mar Drugs. 2018 Jan 13;16(1):27. doi: 10.3390/md16010027. Mar Drugs. 2018. PMID: 29342834 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources